Ag2Dy: enthalpy of formation

5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 2, DFT 2); experimental median -22.3 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1); Materials Project -31.753 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaadws); OQMD -31.994 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1895325).

Systems: Ag–Dy

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Ag2Dy reported in the literature (5)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-22.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.3Ag2Dy298.15experimentalAg–Dy[1] Long 2010
cites Steeb 1968 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 11
report
-39 kJ/mol-atomAg2DymodelAg–Dy[1] Long 2010
cites Niessen 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
-22.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.3Ag2DymodelAg–Dy[1] Long 2010
cites Steeb 1968 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 32
report
-32.579 kJ/mol-atomAg2Dy298.15DFTfirst-principles calculationsAg–Dy[1] Long 2010Table 1, p. 3, row 10
report
-32.579 kJ/mol-atomAg2Dy298.15DFTfirst-principles (VASP PAW-GGA)Ag–Dy[1] Long 2010Table 1, p. 3, row 31
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Ag2Dy
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-22.3kJ/mol-atom2.35.000e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-39kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-22.3kJ/mol-atom2.35.000e-53.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-32.579kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-32.579kJ/mol-atom5.000e-58.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Ag2Dy
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaadws-31.753-0.329095I4/mmm00no
OQMDoqmd-1895325-31.994-0.3316P4mm00yes

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Z.H. Long, Y.J. Yang, S. Jin, H.S. Liu, F. Zheng, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessments of Ag–Dy and Ag–Er binary systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 489, 146-151 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.036