Ag2Er: enthalpy of formation

5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 2, DFT 2); experimental median -24 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1); Materials Project -32.114 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaabswx); OQMD -33.095 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1976497).

Systems: Ag–Er

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Ag2Er reported in the literature (5)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-24 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.3Ag2Er298.15experimentalAg–Er[1] Long 2010
cites Steeb 1968 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 17
report
-39 kJ/mol-atomAg2ErmodelAg–Er[1] Long 2010
cites Niessen 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 18
report
-24 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.3Ag2ErmodelAg–Er[1] Long 2010
cites Steeb 1968 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 34
report
-34.119 kJ/mol-atomAg2Er298.15DFTfirst-principles calculationsAg–Er[1] Long 2010Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
-34.119 kJ/mol-atomAg2Er298.15DFTfirst-principles (VASP PAW-GGA)Ag–Er[1] Long 2010Table 1, p. 3, row 33
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Ag2Er
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-24kJ/mol-atom2.35.000e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-39kJ/mol-atom5.000e-53.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-24kJ/mol-atom2.35.000e-53.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-34.119kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-34.119kJ/mol-atom5.000e-58.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Ag2Er
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaabswx-32.114-0.332838I4/mmm00no
OQMDoqmd-1976497-33.095-0.343003Fmmm00yes

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Z.H. Long, Y.J. Yang, S. Jin, H.S. Liu, F. Zheng, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessments of Ag–Dy and Ag–Er binary systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 489, 146-151 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.036