Ag2Se: enthalpy of formation

24 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 14, model 2, DFT 8); experimental median -13.623 kJ/mol-atom (n = 14); Materials Project -21.663 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaabgjqe); OQMD -7.938 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1374449).

Systems: Ag–Se

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Ag2Se reported in the literature (24)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-14.3633 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Voronin 2011 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 4
report
-14.2433 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Osadchii 2007 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 1
report
-14.2333 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Nasar 1997 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 15
report
-14.2333 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Nasar 1997 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 2
report
-14.1367 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Voronin 2011 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
-14.12 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Grnvold 2003 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 7
report
-13.7067 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Feng 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
-13.54 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Oehsen 1981 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
-13.3667 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Olin 2005
Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
-11.6867 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Feng 2013 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 13
report
-11.6833 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Grnvold 2003 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
-11.68 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Voronin 2011 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 11
report
-11.6733 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Osadchii 2007 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 10
report
-11.6667 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag2Se298.15experimentalAg–Se[1] Li 2018
cites Oehsen 1981 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 14
report
-14.2433 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2Se298.15modelAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 9
report
-11.67 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag2Se298.15modelAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
-9.936 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2SeDFTDFTAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 1
report
-9.936 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag₂Se0DFTDFTAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 1
report
-5.869 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag2SeDFTDFTAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 2
report
-5.869 kJ/mol-atomα-Ag₂Se0DFTDFTAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 2
report
-4.127 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag2SeDFTDFTAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 7
report
-4.127 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag₂Se0DFTDFTAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 7
report
-3.196 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag2SeDFTDFTAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 8
report
-3.196 kJ/mol-atomβ-Ag₂Se0DFTDFTAg–Se[1] Li 2018Table 4, p. 6, row 8
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Ag2Se
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-14.3633kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-14.2433kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-14.2333kJ/mol-atom0.016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-14.2333kJ/mol-atom0.016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-14.1367kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-14.12kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-13.7067kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-13.54kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-13.3667kJ/mol-atom0.016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-11.6867kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-11.6833kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-11.68kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-11.6733kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-11.6667kJ/mol-atom0.016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-14.2433kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-11.67kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-9.936kJ/mol-atom5.000e-49.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-9.936kJ/mol-atom5.000e-49.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-5.869kJ/mol-atom5.000e-49.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-5.869kJ/mol-atom5.000e-49.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-4.127kJ/mol-atom5.000e-49.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-4.127kJ/mol-atom5.000e-49.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-3.196kJ/mol-atom5.000e-49.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-3.196kJ/mol-atom5.000e-49.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Ag2Se
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaabgjqe-21.663-0.224522P2_12_12_100no
OQMDoqmd-1374449-7.938-0.082276Cmcm00yes

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Zhi Li, Shun-Li Shang, Jianyun Shen, Po-Hsien Liao, Zi-Kui Liu, Timothy J. Anderson, Thermodynamic Assessment of the Ag-Se System Aided by First-Principles Calculations, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 39, 870-881 (2018). doi:10.1007/s11669-018-0683-7