Al13Ru4: enthalpy of formation

2 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 2); Materials Project -51.776 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaabals); OQMD -51.227 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-54943).

Systems: Al–Ru

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Al13Ru4 reported in the literature (2)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-38.535 kJ/mol-atomRu4Al13modelAl–Ru[1] Prins 2003Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
-30.03 kJ/mol-atomRu4Al13modelAl–Ru[1] Prins 2003
cites ref. 1998Wol
Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Al13Ru4
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-38.535kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-30.03kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Al13Ru4
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaabals-51.776-0.536619C2/m00no
OQMDoqmd-54943-51.227-0.530929C2/m00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. S.N. Prins, L.A. Cornish, W.E. Stumpf, B. Sundman, Thermodynamic assessment of the AlRu system, Calphad 27, 79-90 (2003). doi:10.1016/s0364-5916(03)00033-6