Al2Ca: enthalpy of formation
18 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 8, model 5, DFT 5); experimental median -32.35 kJ/mol-atom (n = 8); Materials Project -32.104 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaadom); OQMD -32.307 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-5774).
Systems: Al–Ca
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -34.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.5 | C15-Al2Ca | 298.15 | experimental | Experiment | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Notin 1982 doi | Table IV, p. 5, row 21 report | |
| -34.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.5 | Al2Ca | 800 | experimental | Emf | Al–Ca | [2] ISLAM 2005 cites ref. 35 | Table V, p. 9, row 3 report | |
| -33.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.6 | C15-Al2Ca | 298.15 | experimental | Experiment | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Notin 1995 doi | Table IV, p. 5, row 20 report | |
| -33.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.6 | Al2Ca | 1038 | experimental | Precipitation Calorimetry | Al–Ca | [2] ISLAM 2005 cites ref. 31 | Table V, p. 9, row 2 report | |
| -31.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.5 | C15-Al2Ca | 298.15 | experimental | Experiment | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Veleckis 1981 doi | Table IV, p. 5, row 22 report | |
| -31.28 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.46 | Al2Ca | 788 | experimental | Hydrogen Titration | Al–Ca | [2] ISLAM 2005 cites ref. 34 | Table V, p. 9, row 1 report | |
| -29.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.9 | C15-Al2Ca | 298.15 | experimental | Experiment | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Kevorkov 2001 | Table IV, p. 5, row 19 report | |
| -29.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.9 | Al2Ca | 298.15 | experimental | Dissolution Calorimetry | Al–Ca | [2] ISLAM 2005 cites ref. 26 | Table V, p. 9, row 4 report | |
| -41.732 kJ/mol-atom | C15-Al2Ca | model | thermodynamic evaluation | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Itkin 1988 doi | Table IV, p. 5, row 15 report | ||
| -32.185 kJ/mol-atom | C15-Al2Ca | model | thermodynamic evaluation | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Ozturk 2002 doi | Table IV, p. 5, row 16 report | ||
| -29.7 kJ/mol-atom | C15-Al2Ca | model | thermodynamic evaluation | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Kevorkov 2001 | Table IV, p. 5, row 17 report | ||
| -29.7 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Ca | 800 | model | Assessed | Al–Ca | [2] ISLAM 2005 cites ref. 26 | Table V, p. 9, row 5 report | |
| -29.28 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Ca | 298.15 | model | Calculated in this work | Al–Ca | [2] ISLAM 2005 | Table V, p. 9, row 6 report | |
| -36.604 kJ/mol-atom | C15-Al2Ca | 0 | DFT | WIEN2k | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 | Table IV, p. 5, row 11 report | |
| -36.272 kJ/mol-atom | C15-Al2Ca | 0 | DFT | VASP | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 | Table IV, p. 5, row 13 report | |
| -34.018 kJ/mol-atom | C15-Al2Ca | 0 | DFT | VASP | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 | Table IV, p. 5, row 14 report | |
| -32.136 kJ/mol-atom | C15-Al2Ca | 0 | DFT | WIEN2k | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 | Table IV, p. 5, row 12 report | |
| -32.048 kJ/mol-atom | C15-Al2Ca | 0 | DFT | thermodynamic evaluation | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 | Table IV, p. 5, row 18 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -34.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 3.5 | 5.000e-5 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | |||
| -34.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 3.5 | 0.05 | 4.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.6 | |||
| -33.4 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.6 | 5.000e-5 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | |||
| -33.4 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.6 | 0.05 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 3.2 | |||
| -31.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 5.000e-5 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | |||
| -31.28 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.46 | 0.005 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | |||
| -29.4 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.9 | 5.000e-5 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | |||
| -29.4 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.9 | 0.05 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 3.2 | |||
| -41.732 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -32.185 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -29.7 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -29.7 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -29.28 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.604 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -36.272 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -34.018 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -32.136 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -32.048 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaadom | -32.104 | -0.332736 | Fd-3m | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-5774 | -32.307 | -0.334836 | Fd-3m | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Koray Ozturk, Yu Zhong, Long-Qing Chen, Zi-Kui Liu, Jorge O. Sofo, C. Wolverton, Linking first-principles energetics to CALPHAD: An application to thermodynamic modeling of the Al-Ca binary system, Metall Mater Trans A 36, 5-13 (2005). doi:10.1007/s11661-005-0133-0
- F. ISLAM, M. MEDRAJ, THERMODYNAMIC MODELLING OF THE Mg-Al-Ca SYSTEM, Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly 44, 523-536 (2005). doi:10.1179/cmq.2005.44.4.523