Al2Te3: enthalpy of formation

7 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 5, model 2); experimental median -63.6 kJ/mol-atom (n = 5); Materials Project -67.973 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaabrqs); OQMD -43.474 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-648344).

Systems: Al–Te

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Al2Te3 reported in the literature (7)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-63.8 kJ/mol-atomAl2Te3298.15experimentalAl–Te[1] Shi 2019
cites Joel 1967
p. 9
report
However, the enthalpy of formation of bAl2Te3 at 25 C obtained in this work (-85.9 kJ/mol-atoms) is less negative than experimental results (-63.8 kJ/mol-atoms[46] and [47] -52.0 kJ/mol-atoms ).
-63.8 kJ/mol-atomβAl2Te3298.15experimentalDirect synthesis calorimetryAl–Te[1] Shi 2019
cites Joel 1967
Table 3, p. 3, row 15
report
-63.6 kJ/mol-atomβAl2Te3298.15experimentalEvaluationAl–Te[1] Shi 2019
cites Mills 1974
Table 3, p. 3, row 17
report
-52 kJ/mol-atomβAl2Te3298.15experimentalTorsion-effusion method for temperatureAl–Te[1] Shi 2019
cites Balducci 1997
Table 3, p. 3, row 16
report
-52 kJ/mol-atomAl2Te3298.15experimentalAl–Te[1] Shi 2019
cites Balducci 1997
p. 9
report
However, the enthalpy of formation of bAl2Te3 at 25 C obtained in this work (-85.9 kJ/mol-atoms) is less negative than experimental results (-63.8 kJ/mol-atoms[46] and [47] -52.0 kJ/mol-atoms ).
-85.9 kJ/mol-atomAl2Te3298.15modelAl–Te[1] Shi 2019p. 9
report
However, the enthalpy of formation of bAl2Te3 at 25 C obtained in this work (-85.9 kJ/mol-atoms) is less negative than experimental results (-63.8 kJ/mol-atoms[46] and [47] -52.0 kJ/mol-atoms ).
-85.9 kJ/mol-atomβAl2Te3298.15modelCALPHADAl–Te[1] Shi 2019Table 3, p. 3, row 18
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Al2Te3
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-63.8kJ/mol-atom0.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-63.8kJ/mol-atom0.053.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-63.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated)3.5
-52kJ/mol-atom0.054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)4.2
-52kJ/mol-atom0.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-85.9kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-85.9kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Al2Te3
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaabrqs-67.973-0.704498P2_1/c00no
OQMDoqmd-648344-43.474-0.450581P21/c00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Chenying Shi, Biaobiao Yang, Biao Hu, Yong Du, Sheng Yao, Thermodynamic Description of the Al–X (X = S, Se, Te) Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 40, 392-402 (2019). doi:10.1007/s11669-019-00733-z