Al2Zr: enthalpy of formation

50 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 16, model 27, DFT 7); experimental median -51.7 kJ/mol-atom (n = 12); Materials Project -51.892 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaecq); OQMD -52.115 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-9987).

Systems: Al–Zr

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Al2Zr reported in the literature (50)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-56.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.2Al2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Macia 2018
Table 4, p. 7, row 23
report
-54 unknown ± 4Al2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 73
report
-54 kJ/mol-atom ± 4Al2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 22
report
-54 kJ/mol-atomZrAl2298.15experimentalAl–Zr[3] T 2001
cites Kematick 1984
Table 2, p. 2, row 21
report
-52.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.6Al2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Meschel 1993 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 17
report
-52.1 kJ/mol-atomZrAl2298.15experimentalAl–Zr[3] T 2001
cites Meschel 1993
Table 2, p. 2, row 23
report
-52.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.6Al2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Meschel 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 21
report
-51.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.3Al2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Klein 1994 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 18
report
-51.3 unknownAl2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Klein 1994 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 74
report
-51.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.3Al2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Klein 1994 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 20
report
-51.3 kJ/mol-atomZrAl2298.15experimentalAl–Zr[3] T 2001
cites Klein 1994
Table 2, p. 2, row 24
report
-45.83 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 16
report
-45.81 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[5] Saunders 1986
cites ref. 36
Table 2, p. 5, row 3
report
-44 kJ/mol-atomZrAl2298.15experimentalAl–Zr[3] T 2001
cites Alcock 2001
Table 2, p. 2, row 22
report
-44 unknownAl2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Kubaschewski 1976
Table 3, p. 9, row 76
report
52.1 unknown ± 1.6Al2Zr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Meschel 1993 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 75
report
-58.257 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrmodelAl–Zr[1] Long 2020Table 4, p. 7, row 15
report
-53.32 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 23
report
-52.6 kJ/mol-atomZrAl2modelAl–Zr[3] T 2001Table 2, p. 2, row 26
report
-52.6 unknownAl2ZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 79
report
-52.6 unknownAl2ZrmodelAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018Table 3, p. 9, row 68
report
-52.6 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 21
report
-52.582 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 27
report
-52.23 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 26
report
-52.1 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Saal 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 28
report
-52.02 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Colinet 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 27
report
-52.01 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Mihalkovic 2011
Table 2, p. 4, row 25
report
-51.602 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Fischer 2015 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 28
report
-51.6 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Duan 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 29
report
-51.6 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 22
report
-51.446 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Tamim 2018 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 29
report
-51.446 unknownAl2ZrmodelAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018Table 3, p. 9, row 69
report
-47.84 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 24
report
-45.81 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1989
Table 4, p. 7, row 25
report
-45.81 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 4, row 20
report
-45.8 kJ/mol-atomZrAl2modelAl–Zr[3] T 2001
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 2, row 25
report
-45.8 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 24
report
-45.8 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr1modelAl–Zr[5] Saunders 1986Table 4, p. 8, row 9
report
-45.8 unknownAl2ZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Saunders 1988
Table 3, p. 9, row 77
report
-45.54 kJ/mol-atomAl2Zr298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 19
report
-45.536 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 26
report
-45.536 unknownAl2ZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 78
report
-44.36 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrmodelAl–Zr[5] Saunders 1986Table 2, p. 5, row 4
report
-53.327 unknownAl2ZrDFTab initioAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 72
report
-53.327 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrDFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 18
report
-52.23 unknownAl2ZrDFTab initioAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 71
report
-52.23 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrDFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 17
report
-51.603 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrDFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Duan 2013
Table 4, p. 7, row 16
report
-51.603 unknownAl2ZrDFTab initioAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Duan 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 70
report
-47.837 kJ/mol-atomAl2ZrDFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 19
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Al2Zr
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-56.3kJ/mol-atom2.20.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-54unknown40.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom4
-54kJ/mol-atom40.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)4
-54kJ/mol-atom0.53.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-52.1kJ/mol-atom1.60.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-52.1kJ/mol-atom0.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-52.1kJ/mol-atom1.60.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-51.3kJ/mol-atom4.30.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)4.3
-51.3unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-51.3kJ/mol-atom4.30.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)4.3
-51.3kJ/mol-atom0.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-45.83kJ/mol-atom0.0053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-45.81kJ/mol-atom0.0053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-44kJ/mol-atom0.53.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-44unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
52.1unknown1.60.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom1.6
-58.257kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-53.32kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-52.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-52.6unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-52.6unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-52.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-52.582kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-52.23kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-52.1kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-52.02kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-52.01kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-51.602kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-51.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-51.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-51.446kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-51.446unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-47.84kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.81kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.81kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.8kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.8kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.8kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.8unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-45.54kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.536kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.536unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-44.36kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-53.327unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-53.327kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-52.23unknown0.005unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-52.23kJ/mol-atom0.0058.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-51.603kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-51.603unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-47.837kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Al2Zr
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaaecq-51.892-0.537823P6_3/mmc00no
OQMDoqmd-9987-52.115-0.54014P63/mmc00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Zhaohui Long, Dongyu Cui, Hongxing Hu, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Touwen Fan, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Li-Zr Ternary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 623-641 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00827-z
  2. Rkia Tamim, Kamal Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the Al–Zr binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 1187-1200 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6635-3
  3. T. Wang, Z. Jin, J.-C. Zhao, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 544-51(2001). doi:10.1007/s12385-001-0072-4
  4. Evelyne Fischer, Catherine Colinet, An Updated Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Zr System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 404-413 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0398-y
  5. N. Saunders, V. G. Rivlin, Thermodynamic characterization of Al–Cr, Al–Zr, and Al–Cr–Zr alloy systems, Materials Science and Technology 2, 520-527 (1986). doi:10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.520