Al2Zr: enthalpy of formation
50 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 16, model 27, DFT 7); experimental median -51.7 kJ/mol-atom (n = 12); Materials Project -51.892 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaecq); OQMD -52.115 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-9987).
Systems: Al–Zr
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -56.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.2 | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Macia 2018 | Table 4, p. 7, row 23 report | ||
| -54 unknown ± 4 | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 73 report | ||
| -54 kJ/mol-atom ± 4 | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 22 report | ||
| -54 kJ/mol-atom | ZrAl2 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [3] T 2001 cites Kematick 1984 | Table 2, p. 2, row 21 report | ||
| -52.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.6 | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Meschel 1993 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 17 report | ||
| -52.1 kJ/mol-atom | ZrAl2 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [3] T 2001 cites Meschel 1993 | Table 2, p. 2, row 23 report | ||
| -52.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.6 | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Meschel 1993 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 21 report | ||
| -51.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.3 | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Klein 1994 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 18 report | ||
| -51.3 unknown | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Klein 1994 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 74 report | ||
| -51.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.3 | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Klein 1994 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 20 report | ||
| -51.3 kJ/mol-atom | ZrAl2 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [3] T 2001 cites Klein 1994 | Table 2, p. 2, row 24 report | ||
| -45.83 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 16 report | ||
| -45.81 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [5] Saunders 1986 cites ref. 36 | Table 2, p. 5, row 3 report | ||
| -44 kJ/mol-atom | ZrAl2 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [3] T 2001 cites Alcock 2001 | Table 2, p. 2, row 22 report | ||
| -44 unknown | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Kubaschewski 1976 | Table 3, p. 9, row 76 report | ||
| 52.1 unknown ± 1.6 | Al2Zr | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Meschel 1993 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 75 report | ||
| -58.257 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | model | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 | Table 4, p. 7, row 15 report | |||
| -53.32 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 23 report | ||
| -52.6 kJ/mol-atom | ZrAl2 | model | Al–Zr | [3] T 2001 | Table 2, p. 2, row 26 report | |||
| -52.6 unknown | Al2Zr | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 79 report | ||
| -52.6 unknown | Al2Zr | model | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 | Table 3, p. 9, row 68 report | |||
| -52.6 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 21 report | |
| -52.582 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 27 report | ||
| -52.23 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 26 report | ||
| -52.1 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Saal 2013 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 28 report | ||
| -52.02 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Colinet 2013 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 27 report | ||
| -52.01 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Mihalkovic 2011 | Table 2, p. 4, row 25 report | ||
| -51.602 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Fischer 2015 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 28 report | ||
| -51.6 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Duan 2014 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 29 report | ||
| -51.6 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 | Table 2, p. 4, row 22 report | |
| -51.446 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Tamim 2018 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 29 report | ||
| -51.446 unknown | Al2Zr | model | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 | Table 3, p. 9, row 69 report | |||
| -47.84 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Zhang 2010 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 24 report | ||
| -45.81 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 4, p. 7, row 25 report | ||
| -45.81 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 2, p. 4, row 20 report | |
| -45.8 kJ/mol-atom | ZrAl2 | model | Al–Zr | [3] T 2001 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 2, p. 2, row 25 report | |||
| -45.8 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Saunders 1986 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 24 report | ||
| -45.8 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 1 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Saunders 1986 | Table 4, p. 8, row 9 report | ||
| -45.8 unknown | Al2Zr | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Saunders 1988 | Table 3, p. 9, row 77 report | ||
| -45.54 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 19 report | |
| -45.536 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 26 report | ||
| -45.536 unknown | Al2Zr | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 78 report | ||
| -44.36 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | model | Al–Zr | [5] Saunders 1986 | Table 2, p. 5, row 4 report | |||
| -53.327 unknown | Al2Zr | DFT | ab initio | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 72 report | ||
| -53.327 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 18 report | ||
| -52.23 unknown | Al2Zr | DFT | ab initio | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 71 report | ||
| -52.23 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 17 report | ||
| -51.603 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Duan 2013 | Table 4, p. 7, row 16 report | ||
| -51.603 unknown | Al2Zr | DFT | ab initio | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Duan 2014 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 70 report | ||
| -47.837 kJ/mol-atom | Al2Zr | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Zhang 2010 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 19 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -56.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 2.2 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | |||
| -54 | unknown | 4 | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | 4 | |||
| -54 | kJ/mol-atom | 4 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 4 | |||
| -54 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -52.1 | kJ/mol-atom | 1.6 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | |||
| -52.1 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -52.1 | kJ/mol-atom | 1.6 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | |||
| -51.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 4.3 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 4.3 | |||
| -51.3 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -51.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 4.3 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 4.3 | |||
| -51.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -45.83 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -45.81 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -44 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -44 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| 52.1 | unknown | 1.6 | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | 1.6 | |||
| -58.257 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -53.32 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -52.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -52.6 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -52.6 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -52.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -52.582 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -52.23 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -52.1 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -52.02 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -52.01 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.602 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.446 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.446 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -47.84 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.81 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.81 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.8 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -45.54 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.536 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.536 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -44.36 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -53.327 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -53.327 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -52.23 | unknown | 0.005 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -52.23 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -51.603 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -51.603 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -47.837 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaaecq | -51.892 | -0.537823 | P6_3/mmc | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-9987 | -52.115 | -0.54014 | P63/mmc | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Zhaohui Long, Dongyu Cui, Hongxing Hu, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Touwen Fan, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Li-Zr Ternary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 623-641 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00827-z
- Rkia Tamim, Kamal Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the Al–Zr binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 1187-1200 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6635-3
- T. Wang, Z. Jin, J.-C. Zhao, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 544-51(2001). doi:10.1007/s12385-001-0072-4
- Evelyne Fischer, Catherine Colinet, An Updated Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Zr System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 404-413 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0398-y
- N. Saunders, V. G. Rivlin, Thermodynamic characterization of Al–Cr, Al–Zr, and Al–Cr–Zr alloy systems, Materials Science and Technology 2, 520-527 (1986). doi:10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.520