Al3Ca8: enthalpy of formation
9 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 2, model 4, DFT 3); experimental median -13.7 kJ/mol-atom (n = 2); Materials Project -14.913 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaacptlo); OQMD -16.15 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-20963).
Systems: Al–Ca
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -13.7 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.3 | Al3Ca8 | 298.15 | experimental | Experiment | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Kevorkov 2001 | Table IV, p. 5, row 45 report | |
| -13.7 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.3 | Al3Ca8 | 298.15 | experimental | Dissolution Calorimetry | Al–Ca | [2] ISLAM 2005 cites ref. 26 | Table V, p. 9, row 12 report | |
| -15.63 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Ca8 | 298.15 | model | Calculated in this work | Al–Ca | [2] ISLAM 2005 | Table V, p. 9, row 14 report | |
| -14 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Ca8 | model | thermodynamic evaluation | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Kevorkov 2001 | Table IV, p. 5, row 43 report | ||
| -14 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Ca8 | 800 | model | Assessed | Al–Ca | [2] ISLAM 2005 cites ref. 26 | Table V, p. 9, row 13 report | |
| -12.83 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Ca8 | model | thermodynamic evaluation | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 cites Ozturk 2002 doi | Table IV, p. 5, row 42 report | ||
| -18.705 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Ca8 | 0 | DFT | VASP | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 | Table IV, p. 5, row 41 report | |
| -18.301 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Ca8 | 0 | DFT | VASP | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 | Table IV, p. 5, row 40 report | |
| -17.679 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Ca8 | 0 | DFT | thermodynamic evaluation | Al–Ca | [1] Ozturk 2005 | Table IV, p. 5, row 44 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -13.7 | kJ/mol-atom | 1.3 | 5.000e-5 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | |||
| -13.7 | kJ/mol-atom | 1.3 | 0.05 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 3.2 | |||
| -15.63 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -14 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -14 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -12.83 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -18.705 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -18.301 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -17.679 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaacptlo | -14.913 | -0.154566 | P-1 | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-20963 | -16.15 | -0.16738 | P-1 | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Koray Ozturk, Yu Zhong, Long-Qing Chen, Zi-Kui Liu, Jorge O. Sofo, C. Wolverton, Linking first-principles energetics to CALPHAD: An application to thermodynamic modeling of the Al-Ca binary system, Metall Mater Trans A 36, 5-13 (2005). doi:10.1007/s11661-005-0133-0
- F. ISLAM, M. MEDRAJ, THERMODYNAMIC MODELLING OF THE Mg-Al-Ca SYSTEM, Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly 44, 523-536 (2005). doi:10.1179/cmq.2005.44.4.523