Al3Zr2: enthalpy of formation
42 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 6, model 29, DFT 7); experimental median -46.96 kJ/mol-atom (n = 5); Materials Project -50.307 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaacfa); OQMD -50.271 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-10622).
Systems: Al–Zr
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -59.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.4 | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Macia 2018 | Table 4, p. 7, row 36 report | ||
| -55 kJ/mol-atom | Zr2Al3 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [2] T 2001 cites Kematick 1984 | Table 2, p. 2, row 18 report | ||
| -55 unknown ± 4 | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [3] Tamim 2018 cites Kuznetsov 1983 | Table 3, p. 9, row 64 report | ||
| -46.96 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 30 report | ||
| -46.94 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [5] Saunders 1986 cites ref. 36 | Table 2, p. 5, row 5 report | ||
| 55 kJ/mol-atom ± 4 | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 35 report | ||
| -57.664 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | model | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 | Table 4, p. 7, row 30 report | |||
| -56.613 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 40 report | ||
| -56.6 kJ/mol-atom | Zr2Al3 | model | Al–Zr | [2] T 2001 | Table 2, p. 2, row 20 report | |||
| -56.6 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 33 report | |
| -56.6 unknown | Al3Zr2 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [3] Tamim 2018 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 67 report | ||
| -51.65 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 36 report | ||
| -50.613 unknown | Al3Zr2 | model | Al–Zr | [3] Tamim 2018 | Table 3, p. 9, row 59 report | |||
| -50.27 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Saal 2013 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 42 report | ||
| -50.12 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Mihalkovic 2011 | Table 2, p. 4, row 38 report | ||
| -49.96 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Colinet 2013 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 41 report | ||
| -49.9 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 | Table 2, p. 4, row 35 report | |
| -49.9 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Harvey 2012 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 40 report | ||
| -49.9 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Harvey 2012 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 34 report | |
| -49.899 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Fischer 2015 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 41 report | ||
| -49.87 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Duan 2014 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 43 report | ||
| -49.84 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 39 report | ||
| -49.005 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Tamim 2018 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 42 report | ||
| -49.005 unknown | Al3Zr2 | model | Al–Zr | [3] Tamim 2018 | Table 3, p. 9, row 60 report | |||
| -47.3 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Saunders 1986 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 37 report | ||
| -47.3 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 1 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Saunders 1986 | Table 4, p. 8, row 10 report | ||
| -46.94 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 4, p. 7, row 38 report | ||
| -46.94 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 2, p. 4, row 32 report | |
| -46.9 kJ/mol-atom | Zr2Al3 | model | Al–Zr | [2] T 2001 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 2, p. 2, row 19 report | |||
| -46.9 unknown | Al3Zr2 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [3] Tamim 2018 cites Saunders 1988 | Table 3, p. 9, row 65 report | ||
| -45.58 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Saunders 1986 | Table 2, p. 5, row 6 report | |||
| -45.47 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Zhang 2010 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 37 report | ||
| -45.2 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 39 report | ||
| -45.2 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [4] Fischer 2015 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 31 report | |
| -45.2 unknown | Al3Zr2 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [3] Tamim 2018 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 66 report | ||
| -51.649 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 33 report | ||
| -51.649 unknown | Al3Zr2 | DFT | ab initio | Al–Zr | [3] Tamim 2018 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 63 report | ||
| -49.867 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Duan 2013 | Table 4, p. 7, row 31 report | ||
| -49.867 unknown | Al3Zr2 | DFT | ab initio | Al–Zr | [3] Tamim 2018 cites Duan 2014 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 61 report | ||
| -49.84 unknown | Al3Zr2 | DFT | ab initio | Al–Zr | [3] Tamim 2018 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 62 report | ||
| -49.84 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 32 report | ||
| -45.474 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr2 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Zhang 2010 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 34 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -59.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 2.4 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | |||
| -55 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -55 | unknown | 4 | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | 4 | |||
| -46.96 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -46.94 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 55 | kJ/mol-atom | 4 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 4 | |||
| -57.664 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -56.613 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -56.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -56.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -56.6 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -51.65 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -50.613 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -50.27 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -50.12 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.96 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.9 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.9 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.9 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.899 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.87 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.84 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.005 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.005 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -47.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -47.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -46.94 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -46.94 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -46.9 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -46.9 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -45.58 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.47 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.2 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -51.649 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -51.649 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -49.867 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -49.867 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -49.84 | unknown | 0.005 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -49.84 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -45.474 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaacfa | -50.307 | -0.521393 | Fdd2 | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-10622 | -50.271 | -0.521025 | Fdd2 | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Zhaohui Long, Dongyu Cui, Hongxing Hu, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Touwen Fan, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Li-Zr Ternary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 623-641 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00827-z
- T. Wang, Z. Jin, J.-C. Zhao, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 544-51(2001). doi:10.1007/s12385-001-0072-4
- Rkia Tamim, Kamal Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the Al–Zr binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 1187-1200 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6635-3
- Evelyne Fischer, Catherine Colinet, An Updated Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Zr System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 404-413 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0398-y
- N. Saunders, V. G. Rivlin, Thermodynamic characterization of Al–Cr, Al–Zr, and Al–Cr–Zr alloy systems, Materials Science and Technology 2, 520-527 (1986). doi:10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.520