Al3Zr2: enthalpy of formation

42 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 6, model 29, DFT 7); experimental median -46.96 kJ/mol-atom (n = 5); Materials Project -50.307 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaacfa); OQMD -50.271 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-10622).

Systems: Al–Zr

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Al3Zr2 reported in the literature (42)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-59.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.4Al3Zr2298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Macia 2018
Table 4, p. 7, row 36
report
-55 kJ/mol-atomZr2Al3298.15experimentalAl–Zr[2] T 2001
cites Kematick 1984
Table 2, p. 2, row 18
report
-55 unknown ± 4Al3Zr2298.15experimentalAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Kuznetsov 1983
Table 3, p. 9, row 64
report
-46.96 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15experimentalAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 30
report
-46.94 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15experimentalAl–Zr[5] Saunders 1986
cites ref. 36
Table 2, p. 5, row 5
report
55 kJ/mol-atom ± 4Al3Zr2298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 35
report
-57.664 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2modelAl–Zr[1] Long 2020Table 4, p. 7, row 30
report
-56.613 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 40
report
-56.6 kJ/mol-atomZr2Al3modelAl–Zr[2] T 2001Table 2, p. 2, row 20
report
-56.6 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 33
report
-56.6 unknownAl3Zr2modelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 67
report
-51.65 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 36
report
-50.613 unknownAl3Zr2modelAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018Table 3, p. 9, row 59
report
-50.27 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Saal 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 42
report
-50.12 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Mihalkovic 2011
Table 2, p. 4, row 38
report
-49.96 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Colinet 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 41
report
-49.9 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 35
report
-49.9 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Harvey 2012 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 40
report
-49.9 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Harvey 2012 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 34
report
-49.899 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Fischer 2015 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 41
report
-49.87 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Duan 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 43
report
-49.84 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 39
report
-49.005 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Tamim 2018 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 42
report
-49.005 unknownAl3Zr2modelAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018Table 3, p. 9, row 60
report
-47.3 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 37
report
-47.3 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr21modelAl–Zr[5] Saunders 1986Table 4, p. 8, row 10
report
-46.94 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1989
Table 4, p. 7, row 38
report
-46.94 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 4, row 32
report
-46.9 kJ/mol-atomZr2Al3modelAl–Zr[2] T 2001
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 2, row 19
report
-46.9 unknownAl3Zr2modelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Saunders 1988
Table 3, p. 9, row 65
report
-45.58 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2modelAl–Zr[5] Saunders 1986Table 2, p. 5, row 6
report
-45.47 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 37
report
-45.2 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 39
report
-45.2 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 31
report
-45.2 unknownAl3Zr2modelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 66
report
-51.649 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 33
report
-51.649 unknownAl3Zr2DFTab initioAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 63
report
-49.867 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Duan 2013
Table 4, p. 7, row 31
report
-49.867 unknownAl3Zr2DFTab initioAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Duan 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 61
report
-49.84 unknownAl3Zr2DFTab initioAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 62
report
-49.84 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 32
report
-45.474 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr2DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 34
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Al3Zr2
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-59.6kJ/mol-atom2.40.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-55kJ/mol-atom0.53.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-55unknown40.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom4
-46.96kJ/mol-atom0.0053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-46.94kJ/mol-atom0.0053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
55kJ/mol-atom40.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)4
-57.664kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-56.613kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-56.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-56.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-56.6unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-51.65kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-50.613unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-50.27kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-50.12kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.96kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.9kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.9kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.9kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.899kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.87kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.84kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.005kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.005unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-47.3kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-47.3kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-46.94kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-46.94kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-46.9kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-46.9unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-45.58kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.47kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.2kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.2kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.2unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-51.649kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-51.649unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-49.867kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-49.867unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-49.84unknown0.005unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-49.84kJ/mol-atom0.0058.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-45.474kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Al3Zr2
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaacfa-50.307-0.521393Fdd200no
OQMDoqmd-10622-50.271-0.521025Fdd200no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Zhaohui Long, Dongyu Cui, Hongxing Hu, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Touwen Fan, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Li-Zr Ternary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 623-641 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00827-z
  2. T. Wang, Z. Jin, J.-C. Zhao, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 544-51(2001). doi:10.1007/s12385-001-0072-4
  3. Rkia Tamim, Kamal Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the Al–Zr binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 1187-1200 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6635-3
  4. Evelyne Fischer, Catherine Colinet, An Updated Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Zr System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 404-413 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0398-y
  5. N. Saunders, V. G. Rivlin, Thermodynamic characterization of Al–Cr, Al–Zr, and Al–Cr–Zr alloy systems, Materials Science and Technology 2, 520-527 (1986). doi:10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.520