Al3Zr5: enthalpy of formation
30 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 4, model 22, DFT 4); experimental median -43.5 kJ/mol-atom (n = 4); Materials Project -36.102 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaytg); OQMD -36.236 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-10625).
Systems: Al–Zr
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -48 kJ/mol-atom | Zr5Al3 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [1] T 2001 cites Kematick 1984 | Table 2, p. 2, row 5 report | ||
| -48 kJ/mol-atom ± 4 | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 94 report | ||
| -39 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 92 report | ||
| -38.99 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [4] Saunders 1986 cites ref. 36 | Table 2, p. 5, row 13 report | ||
| -51.5 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 95 report | |
| -51.5 kJ/mol-atom | Zr5Al3 | model | Al–Zr | [1] T 2001 | Table 2, p. 2, row 7 report | |||
| -51.484 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 98 report | ||
| -47.803 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | model | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 | Table 4, p. 7, row 89 report | |||
| -39.973 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Tamim 2018 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 100 report | ||
| -39.806 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 1 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Saunders 1986 | Table 4, p. 8, row 14 report | ||
| -39.806 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Saunders 1986 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 95 report | ||
| -39 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 97 report | ||
| -39 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 93 report | |
| -37.6 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 97 report | ||
| -37.11 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Saunders 1986 | Table 2, p. 5, row 14 report | |||
| -36.611 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Fischer 2015 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 99 report | ||
| -36.56 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 | Table 2, p. 4, row 96 report | |
| -36.54 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Mihalkovic 2011 | Table 2, p. 4, row 99 report | ||
| -36.28 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Saal 2013 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 102 report | ||
| -36.25 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 2, p. 4, row 94 report | |
| -36.248 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 4, p. 7, row 96 report | ||
| -36.2 kJ/mol-atom | Zr5Al3 | model | Al–Zr | [1] T 2001 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 2, p. 2, row 6 report | |||
| -36.02 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 100 report | ||
| -35.94 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Colinet 2013 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 101 report | ||
| -35.3 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Duan 2014 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 103 report | ||
| -33.28 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [3] Fischer 2015 cites Zhang 2010 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 98 report | ||
| -37.599 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 92 report | ||
| -36.02 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 91 report | ||
| -35.308 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Duan 2013 | Table 4, p. 7, row 90 report | ||
| -33.283 kJ/mol-atom | Al3Zr5 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [2] Long 2020 cites Zhang 2010 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 93 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -48 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -48 | kJ/mol-atom | 4 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 4 | |||
| -39 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -38.99 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -51.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.484 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -47.803 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -39.973 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -39.806 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -39.806 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -39 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -39 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -37.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -37.11 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.611 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.56 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.54 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.28 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.25 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.248 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.02 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -35.94 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -35.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -33.28 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -37.599 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -36.02 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -35.308 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -33.283 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaaytg | -36.102 | -0.374173 | I4/mcm | 3.7342 | 0.0387 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-10625 | -36.236 | -0.375559 | I4/mcm | 3.5181 | 0.0365 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- T. Wang, Z. Jin, J.-C. Zhao, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 544-51(2001). doi:10.1007/s12385-001-0072-4
- Zhaohui Long, Dongyu Cui, Hongxing Hu, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Touwen Fan, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Li-Zr Ternary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 623-641 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00827-z
- Evelyne Fischer, Catherine Colinet, An Updated Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Zr System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 404-413 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0398-y
- N. Saunders, V. G. Rivlin, Thermodynamic characterization of Al–Cr, Al–Zr, and Al–Cr–Zr alloy systems, Materials Science and Technology 2, 520-527 (1986). doi:10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.520