Al3Zr5: enthalpy of formation

30 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 4, model 22, DFT 4); experimental median -43.5 kJ/mol-atom (n = 4); Materials Project -36.102 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaytg); OQMD -36.236 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-10625).

Systems: Al–Zr

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Al3Zr5 reported in the literature (30)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-48 kJ/mol-atomZr5Al3298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] T 2001
cites Kematick 1984
Table 2, p. 2, row 5
report
-48 kJ/mol-atom ± 4Al3Zr5298.15experimentalAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 94
report
-39 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15experimentalAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 92
report
-38.99 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15experimentalAl–Zr[4] Saunders 1986
cites ref. 36
Table 2, p. 5, row 13
report
-51.5 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 95
report
-51.5 kJ/mol-atomZr5Al3modelAl–Zr[1] T 2001Table 2, p. 2, row 7
report
-51.484 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 98
report
-47.803 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5modelAl–Zr[2] Long 2020Table 4, p. 7, row 89
report
-39.973 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Tamim 2018 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 100
report
-39.806 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr51modelAl–Zr[4] Saunders 1986Table 4, p. 8, row 14
report
-39.806 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 95
report
-39 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 97
report
-39 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 93
report
-37.6 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 97
report
-37.11 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5modelAl–Zr[4] Saunders 1986Table 2, p. 5, row 14
report
-36.611 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Fischer 2015 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 99
report
-36.56 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 96
report
-36.54 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Mihalkovic 2011
Table 2, p. 4, row 99
report
-36.28 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Saal 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 102
report
-36.25 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 4, row 94
report
-36.248 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1989
Table 4, p. 7, row 96
report
-36.2 kJ/mol-atomZr5Al3modelAl–Zr[1] T 2001
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 2, row 6
report
-36.02 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 100
report
-35.94 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Colinet 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 101
report
-35.3 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Duan 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 103
report
-33.28 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[3] Fischer 2015
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 98
report
-37.599 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 92
report
-36.02 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 91
report
-35.308 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Duan 2013
Table 4, p. 7, row 90
report
-33.283 kJ/mol-atomAl3Zr5DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[2] Long 2020
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 93
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Al3Zr5
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-48kJ/mol-atom0.53.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-48kJ/mol-atom40.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)4
-39kJ/mol-atom0.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-38.99kJ/mol-atom0.0053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-51.5kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-51.5kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-51.484kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-47.803kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-39.973kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-39.806kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-39.806kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-39kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-39kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-37.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-37.11kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-36.611kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-36.56kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-36.54kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-36.28kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-36.25kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-36.248kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-36.2kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-36.02kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-35.94kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-35.3kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-33.28kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-37.599kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-36.02kJ/mol-atom0.0058.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-35.308kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-33.283kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Al3Zr5
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaaytg-36.102-0.374173I4/mcm3.73420.0387no
OQMDoqmd-10625-36.236-0.375559I4/mcm3.51810.0365no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. T. Wang, Z. Jin, J.-C. Zhao, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 544-51(2001). doi:10.1007/s12385-001-0072-4
  2. Zhaohui Long, Dongyu Cui, Hongxing Hu, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Touwen Fan, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Li-Zr Ternary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 623-641 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00827-z
  3. Evelyne Fischer, Catherine Colinet, An Updated Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Zr System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 404-413 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0398-y
  4. N. Saunders, V. G. Rivlin, Thermodynamic characterization of Al–Cr, Al–Zr, and Al–Cr–Zr alloy systems, Materials Science and Technology 2, 520-527 (1986). doi:10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.520