Al4Zr5: enthalpy of formation

39 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 5, model 27, DFT 7); experimental median -47.8 kJ/mol-atom (n = 4); Materials Project -40.375 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaabgmiw); OQMD -40.389 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-27980).

Systems: Al–Zr

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Al4Zr5 reported in the literature (39)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-52 kJ/mol-atom ± 4Al4Zr5298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 61
report
-52 unknown ± 4Al4Zr5298.15experimentalAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 46
report
-52 kJ/mol-atomZr5Al4298.15experimentalAl–Zr[3] T 2001
cites Kematick 1984
Table 2, p. 2, row 12
report
-43.6 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15experimentalAl–Zr[4] Saunders 1986
cites ref. 36
Table 2, p. 5, row 9
report
-43.59 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15experimentalAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 58
report
-55.424 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 65
report
-55.4 kJ/mol-atomZr5Al4modelAl–Zr[3] T 2001Table 2, p. 2, row 14
report
-55.4 unknownAl4Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 49
report
-55.4 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 61
report
-49.419 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5modelAl–Zr[1] Long 2020Table 4, p. 7, row 56
report
-45.597 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr51modelAl–Zr[4] Saunders 1986Table 4, p. 8, row 12
report
-45.597 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 62
report
-43.717 unknownAl4Zr5modelAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018Table 3, p. 9, row 41
report
-43.2 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5modelAl–Zr[4] Saunders 1986Table 2, p. 5, row 10
report
-43.13 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 59
report
-43.127 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 64
report
-43.127 unknownAl4Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 48
report
-42 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 63
report
-41.371 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Tamim 2018 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 67
report
-41.371 unknownAl4Zr5modelAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018Table 3, p. 9, row 42
report
-41 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 4, row 60
report
-41 kJ/mol-atomZr5Al4modelAl–Zr[3] T 2001
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 2, row 13
report
-41 unknownAl4Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Saunders 1988
Table 3, p. 9, row 47
report
-41 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1989
Table 4, p. 7, row 63
report
-40.5 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Mihalkovic 2011
Table 2, p. 4, row 65
report
-40.43 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Saal 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 68
report
-40.35 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Colinet 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 67
report
-40.18 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Duan 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 69
report
-40.06 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 66
report
-38.725 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5modelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Fischer 2015 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 66
report
-38.66 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 62
report
-35.21 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5298.15modelAl–Zr[5] Fischer 2015
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 64
report
-42.002 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 59
report
-42.002 unknownAl4Zr5DFTab initioAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 45
report
-40.175 unknownAl4Zr5DFTab initioAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Duan 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 43
report
-40.175 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Duan 2013
Table 4, p. 7, row 57
report
-40.06 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 58
report
-40.06 unknownAl4Zr5DFTab initioAl–Zr[2] Tamim 2018
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 44
report
-35.208 kJ/mol-atomAl4Zr5DFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 60
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Al4Zr5
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-52kJ/mol-atom40.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)4
-52unknown40.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom4
-52kJ/mol-atom0.53.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-43.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-43.59kJ/mol-atom0.0053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-55.424kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-55.4kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-55.4unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-55.4kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-49.419kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.597kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.597kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-43.717unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-43.2kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-43.13kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-43.127kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-43.127unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-42kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-41.371kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-41.371unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-41kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-41kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-41unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-41kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-40.5kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-40.43kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-40.35kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-40.18kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-40.06kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-38.725kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-38.66kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-35.21kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-42.002kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-42.002unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-40.175unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-40.175kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-40.06kJ/mol-atom0.0058.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-40.06unknown0.005unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-35.208kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Al4Zr5
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaabgmiw-40.375-0.418458P6_3/mcm4.57950.0475no
OQMDoqmd-27980-40.389-0.418601P63/mcm4.56810.0473no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Zhaohui Long, Dongyu Cui, Hongxing Hu, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Touwen Fan, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Li-Zr Ternary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 623-641 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00827-z
  2. Rkia Tamim, Kamal Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the Al–Zr binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 1187-1200 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6635-3
  3. T. Wang, Z. Jin, J.-C. Zhao, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 544-51(2001). doi:10.1007/s12385-001-0072-4
  4. N. Saunders, V. G. Rivlin, Thermodynamic characterization of Al–Cr, Al–Zr, and Al–Cr–Zr alloy systems, Materials Science and Technology 2, 520-527 (1986). doi:10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.520
  5. Evelyne Fischer, Catherine Colinet, An Updated Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Zr System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 404-413 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0398-y