Al4Zr5: enthalpy of formation
39 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 5, model 27, DFT 7); experimental median -47.8 kJ/mol-atom (n = 4); Materials Project -40.375 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaabgmiw); OQMD -40.389 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-27980).
Systems: Al–Zr
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -52 kJ/mol-atom ± 4 | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 61 report | ||
| -52 unknown ± 4 | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 46 report | ||
| -52 kJ/mol-atom | Zr5Al4 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [3] T 2001 cites Kematick 1984 | Table 2, p. 2, row 12 report | ||
| -43.6 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [4] Saunders 1986 cites ref. 36 | Table 2, p. 5, row 9 report | ||
| -43.59 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | experimental | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Kematick 1984 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 58 report | ||
| -55.424 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 65 report | ||
| -55.4 kJ/mol-atom | Zr5Al4 | model | Al–Zr | [3] T 2001 | Table 2, p. 2, row 14 report | |||
| -55.4 unknown | Al4Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 49 report | ||
| -55.4 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Wang 2001 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 61 report | |
| -49.419 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | model | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 | Table 4, p. 7, row 56 report | |||
| -45.597 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 1 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Saunders 1986 | Table 4, p. 8, row 12 report | ||
| -45.597 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Saunders 1986 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 62 report | ||
| -43.717 unknown | Al4Zr5 | model | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 | Table 3, p. 9, row 41 report | |||
| -43.2 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | model | Al–Zr | [4] Saunders 1986 | Table 2, p. 5, row 10 report | |||
| -43.13 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 59 report | |
| -43.127 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 64 report | ||
| -43.127 unknown | Al4Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Murray 1992 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 48 report | ||
| -42 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 63 report | ||
| -41.371 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Tamim 2018 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 67 report | ||
| -41.371 unknown | Al4Zr5 | model | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 | Table 3, p. 9, row 42 report | |||
| -41 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 2, p. 4, row 60 report | |
| -41 kJ/mol-atom | Zr5Al4 | model | Al–Zr | [3] T 2001 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 2, p. 2, row 13 report | |||
| -41 unknown | Al4Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Saunders 1988 | Table 3, p. 9, row 47 report | ||
| -41 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Saunders 1989 | Table 4, p. 7, row 63 report | ||
| -40.5 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Mihalkovic 2011 | Table 2, p. 4, row 65 report | ||
| -40.43 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Saal 2013 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 68 report | ||
| -40.35 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Colinet 2013 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 67 report | ||
| -40.18 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Duan 2014 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 69 report | ||
| -40.06 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 66 report | ||
| -38.725 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Fischer 2015 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 66 report | ||
| -38.66 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 | Table 2, p. 4, row 62 report | |
| -35.21 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | 298.15 | model | Al–Zr | [5] Fischer 2015 cites Zhang 2010 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 64 report | ||
| -42.002 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 59 report | ||
| -42.002 unknown | Al4Zr5 | DFT | ab initio | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Ghosh 2005 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 45 report | ||
| -40.175 unknown | Al4Zr5 | DFT | ab initio | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Duan 2014 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 43 report | ||
| -40.175 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Duan 2013 | Table 4, p. 7, row 57 report | ||
| -40.06 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 58 report | ||
| -40.06 unknown | Al4Zr5 | DFT | ab initio | Al–Zr | [2] Tamim 2018 cites Wang 2011 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 44 report | ||
| -35.208 kJ/mol-atom | Al4Zr5 | DFT | Ab-initio | Al–Zr | [1] Long 2020 cites Zhang 2010 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 60 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -52 | kJ/mol-atom | 4 | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 4 | |||
| -52 | unknown | 4 | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | 4 | |||
| -52 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -43.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -43.59 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -55.424 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -55.4 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -55.4 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -55.4 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -49.419 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.597 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.597 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -43.717 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -43.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -43.13 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -43.127 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -43.127 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -42 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -41.371 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -41.371 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -41 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -41 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -41 | unknown | 0.05 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -41 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -40.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -40.43 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -40.35 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -40.18 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -40.06 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -38.725 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -38.66 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -35.21 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -42.002 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -42.002 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -40.175 | unknown | 5.000e-4 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -40.175 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -40.06 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -40.06 | unknown | 0.005 | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -35.208 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaabgmiw | -40.375 | -0.418458 | P6_3/mcm | 4.5795 | 0.0475 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-27980 | -40.389 | -0.418601 | P63/mcm | 4.5681 | 0.0473 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Zhaohui Long, Dongyu Cui, Hongxing Hu, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Touwen Fan, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Li-Zr Ternary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 623-641 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00827-z
- Rkia Tamim, Kamal Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the Al–Zr binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 1187-1200 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6635-3
- T. Wang, Z. Jin, J.-C. Zhao, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 544-51(2001). doi:10.1007/s12385-001-0072-4
- N. Saunders, V. G. Rivlin, Thermodynamic characterization of Al–Cr, Al–Zr, and Al–Cr–Zr alloy systems, Materials Science and Technology 2, 520-527 (1986). doi:10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.520
- Evelyne Fischer, Catherine Colinet, An Updated Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Zr System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 404-413 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0398-y