AlNiPr: enthalpy of formation
5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 2, DFT 2); experimental median -56 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1).
Systems: Al–Ni–Pr
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -56 kJ/mol-atom ± 3 | NiAlPr | 300 | experimental | Al–Ni–Pr | [1] Liao 2019 cites Borzone 2003 | Table 4, p. 6, row 21 report | ||
| -66.97 kJ/mol-atom | NiAlPr | model | Al–Ni–Pr | [1] Liao 2019 | Table 4, p. 6, row 22 report | |||
| -62.07 kJ/mol-atom | NiAlPr | model | Al–Ni–Pr | [1] Liao 2019 | Table 4, p. 6, row 25 report | |||
| -47.6 kJ/mol-atom | NiAlPr | DFT | Al–Ni–Pr | [1] Liao 2019 cites Kirklin 2015 | Table 4, p. 6, row 23 report | |||
| -46.54 kJ/mol-atom | NiAlPr | DFT | Al–Ni–Pr | [1] Liao 2019 cites Jain 2013 | Table 4, p. 6, row 24 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -56 | kJ/mol-atom | 3 | 0.5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | |||
| -66.97 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -62.07 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -47.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.929 (dft, calibrated) | 3.929 | ||||
| -46.54 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.929 (dft, calibrated) | 3.929 |
Sources
- Jinfa Liao, Yuehui Liao, Hang Wang, Ligang Zhang, Yue Ma, Thermodynamic optimization of the Ni–Al–Pr ternary system, Mater. Res. Express 6, 086512 (2019). doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab19fa