AlZr: enthalpy of formation

42 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 6, model 29, DFT 7); experimental median -53 kJ/mol-atom (n = 5); Materials Project -45.406 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaqqb); OQMD -45.296 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-10619).

Systems: Al–Zr

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of AlZr reported in the literature (42)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-71.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.4AlZr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Macia 2018
Table 4, p. 7, row 49
report
-53 kJ/mol-atomZrAl298.15experimentalAl–Zr[2] T 2001
cites Kematick 1984
Table 2, p. 2, row 15
report
-53 kJ/mol-atom ± 4AlZr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 48
report
-53 unknown ± 4AlZr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 55
report
-44.69 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Kematick 1984 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 44
report
-44.69 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15experimentalAl–Zr[5] Saunders 1986
cites ref. 36
Table 2, p. 5, row 7
report
-65.5 unknownAlZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 58
report
-65 kJ/mol-atomZrAlmodelAl–Zr[2] T 2001Table 2, p. 2, row 17
report
-65 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 47
report
-64.95 kJ/mol-atomAlZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Wang 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 53
report
-55.4 kJ/mol-atomAlZrmodelAl–Zr[1] Long 2020Table 4, p. 7, row 43
report
-54.3 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Harvey 2012 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 48
report
-54.3 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Harvey 2012 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 54
report
-47.727 unknownAlZrmodelAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018Table 3, p. 9, row 50
report
-46.897 kJ/mol-atomAlZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 50
report
-46.897 kJ/mol-atomAlZr1modelAl–Zr[5] Saunders 1986Table 4, p. 8, row 11
report
-46.16 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 50
report
-45.434 kJ/mol-atomAlZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Tamim 2018 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 55
report
-45.434 unknownAlZrmodelAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018Table 3, p. 9, row 51
report
-45.35 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Saal 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 56
report
-45.326 kJ/mol-atomAlZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Fischer 2015 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 54
report
-45.28 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Colinet 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 55
report
-44.9 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Mihalkovic 2011
Table 2, p. 4, row 52
report
-44.88 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Duan 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 57
report
-44.79 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 53
report
-44.74 kJ/mol-atomAlZrmodelAl–Zr[5] Saunders 1986Table 2, p. 5, row 8
report
-44.69 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 45
report
-44.685 kJ/mol-atomAlZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 52
report
-44.685 unknownAlZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Murray 1992 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 57
report
-44.5 kJ/mol-atomZrAlmodelAl–Zr[2] T 2001
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 2, row 16
report
-44.5 kJ/mol-atomAlZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Saunders 1989
Table 4, p. 7, row 51
report
-44.5 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Saunders 1989
Table 2, p. 4, row 46
report
-44.5 unknownAlZrmodelCALPHADAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Saunders 1988
Table 3, p. 9, row 56
report
-43.86 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelCALPHADAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 49
report
-40.89 kJ/mol-atomAlZr298.15modelAl–Zr[4] Fischer 2015
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 51
report
-46.163 kJ/mol-atomAlZrDFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 46
report
-46.163 unknownAlZrDFTab initioAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Ghosh 2005 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 54
report
-44.875 kJ/mol-atomAlZrDFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Duan 2013
Table 4, p. 7, row 44
report
-44.875 unknownAlZrDFTab initioAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Duan 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 52
report
-44.79 kJ/mol-atomAlZrDFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 45
report
-44.79 unknownAlZrDFTab initioAl–Zr[3] Tamim 2018
cites Wang 2011 doi
Table 3, p. 9, row 53
report
-40.892 kJ/mol-atomAlZrDFTAb-initioAl–Zr[1] Long 2020
cites Zhang 2010 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 47
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of AlZr
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-71.3kJ/mol-atom4.40.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)4.4
-53kJ/mol-atom0.53.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-53kJ/mol-atom40.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)4
-53unknown40.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom4
-44.69kJ/mol-atom0.0053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-44.69kJ/mol-atom0.0053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-65.5unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-65kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-65kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-64.95kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-55.4kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-54.3kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-54.3kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-47.727unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-46.897kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-46.897kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-46.16kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.434kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.434unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-45.35kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.326kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-45.28kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.9kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.88kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.79kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.74kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.69kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.685kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.685unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-44.5kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.5kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.5kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-44.5unknown0.05unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-43.86kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-40.89kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-46.163kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-46.163unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-44.875kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-44.875unknown5.000e-4unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-44.79kJ/mol-atom0.0058.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-44.79unknown0.005unit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'unknown' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-40.892kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of AlZr
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaaqqb-45.406-0.470607Cmcm1.45940.0151no
OQMDoqmd-10619-45.296-0.469462Cmcm1.55870.0162no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Zhaohui Long, Dongyu Cui, Hongxing Hu, Zhi Li, Fucheng Yin, Touwen Fan, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Li-Zr Ternary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 623-641 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00827-z
  2. T. Wang, Z. Jin, J.-C. Zhao, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 544-51(2001). doi:10.1007/s12385-001-0072-4
  3. Rkia Tamim, Kamal Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the Al–Zr binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 1187-1200 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6635-3
  4. Evelyne Fischer, Catherine Colinet, An Updated Thermodynamic Modeling of the Al-Zr System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 404-413 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0398-y
  5. N. Saunders, V. G. Rivlin, Thermodynamic characterization of Al–Cr, Al–Zr, and Al–Cr–Zr alloy systems, Materials Science and Technology 2, 520-527 (1986). doi:10.1179/mst.1986.2.6.520