Au3Ho: enthalpy of formation

3 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 1, DFT 1); experimental median -67.1 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1); Materials Project -69.705 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaabsys); OQMD -69.899 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-10739).

Systems: Au–Ho

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Au3Ho reported in the literature (3)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-67.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.1Au3Ho298.15experimentalHigh temperature direct synthesis calorimetry at 1373 ± 2 KAu–Ho[1] Dong 2012
cites Meschel 2004 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 22
report
-68.1 kJ/mol-atomAu3Ho298.15modelCALPHAD assessmentAu–Ho[1] Dong 2012Table 1, p. 2, row 23
report
-70.8 kJ/mol-atomAu3Ho0DFTab initioAu–Ho[1] Dong 2012Table 1, p. 2, row 21
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Au3Ho
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-67.1kJ/mol-atom2.10.053.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-68.1kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-70.8kJ/mol-atom0.058.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Au3Ho
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaabsys-69.705-0.722445Pmmn00no
OQMDoqmd-10739-69.899-0.724454Pmmn00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. H.Q. Dong, X.M. Tao, T. Laurila, M. Paulasto-Kröckel, Thermodynamic assessment of Au–Ho and Au–Tm binary systems, Calphad 37, 87-93 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.02.002