AuHo2: enthalpy of formation
2 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 1, DFT 1); Materials Project -62.097 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaabsyr); OQMD -62.432 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-10737).
Systems: Au–Ho
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -65.5 kJ/mol-atom | AuHo2 | 298.15 | model | CALPHAD assessment | Au–Ho | [1] Dong 2012 | Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report | |
| -64.1 kJ/mol-atom | AuHo2 | 0 | DFT | ab initio | Au–Ho | [1] Dong 2012 | Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -65.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -64.1 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaabsyr | -62.097 | -0.643596 | Pnma | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-10737 | -62.432 | -0.647065 | Pnma | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- H.Q. Dong, X.M. Tao, T. Laurila, M. Paulasto-Kröckel, Thermodynamic assessment of Au–Ho and Au–Tm binary systems, Calphad 37, 87-93 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.02.002