AuSn: enthalpy of formation
5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 2, model 2, DFT 1); Materials Project -17.782 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaacqh); OQMD -22.154 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-10120).
Systems: Au–Sn
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -15.69 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | AuSn | 78 | experimental | Au–Sn | [1] Dong 2009 | Table II, p. 4, row 3 report | ||
| -14.88 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | AuSn | 78 | experimental | Au–Sn | [1] Dong 2009 cites Jena 1979 doi | Table II, p. 4, row 4 report | ||
| -15.75 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | AuSn | 10 | model | Au–Sn | [1] Dong 2009 | Table II, p. 4, row 6 report | ||
| -15.69 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | AuSn | 78 | model | Au–Sn | [2] Hu 2022 cites Dong 2009 doi | p. 4 report | In order to compare the accuracy of two results, Dong et al [13] took BCT-type Sn as the reference state and the experimental value of AuSn at 78K was set to -15.69 kJ mol-1 but there was still a certain deviation from the calculated value of -18.77 kJ mol-1. | |
| -18.77 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | AuSn | 0 | DFT | Au–Sn | [1] Dong 2009 | Table II, p. 4, row 5 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -15.69 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 7 (unknown, calibrated) | 7 | ||||
| -14.88 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 7 (unknown, calibrated) | 7 | ||||
| -15.75 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 7.8 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 7.8 | ||||
| -15.69 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 7.8 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 7.8 | ||||
| -18.77 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 16.79 (dft, calibrated) | 16.79 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaacqh | -17.782 | -0.184295 | P6_3/mmc | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-10120 | -22.154 | -0.229613 | P63/mmc | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- H. Q. Dong, S. Jin, L. G. Zhang, J. S. Wang, X. M. Tao, H. S. Liu et al., Thermodynamic Assessment of the Au-Co-Sn Ternary System, Journal of Elec Materi 38, 2158-2169 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11664-009-0874-4
- Jieqiong Hu, Ming Xie, Yongtai Chen, Jiheng Fang, Qiao Zhang, Thermodynamic reassessment of Au–Pt–Sn system, Mater. Res. Express 9, 016507 (2022). doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ac475f