AuTm2: enthalpy of formation

2 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 1, DFT 1); Materials Project -63.921 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaackivy); OQMD -64.161 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1800555).

Systems: Au–Tm

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of AuTm2 reported in the literature (2)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-70 kJ/mol-atomAuTm2298.15modelCALPHAD assessmentAu–Tm[1] Dong 2012Table 1, p. 2, row 38
report
-65.5 kJ/mol-atomAuTm20DFTab initioAu–Tm[1] Dong 2012Table 1, p. 2, row 37
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of AuTm2
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-70kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-65.5kJ/mol-atom0.058.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of AuTm2
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaackivy-63.921-0.662499Pnma00no
OQMDoqmd-1800555-64.161-0.664983Pnma00yes

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. H.Q. Dong, X.M. Tao, T. Laurila, M. Paulasto-Kröckel, Thermodynamic assessment of Au–Ho and Au–Tm binary systems, Calphad 37, 87-93 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.02.002