CeC2: enthalpy of formation

8 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 8); experimental median -30.4 kJ/mol-atom (n = 8); Materials Project -15.378 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaeff); OQMD -8.01 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-13373).

Systems: C–Ce

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of CeC2 reported in the literature (8)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-40.03 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.7CeC2298.15experimentalDynamic effusion MSC–Ce[1] Peng 2011
cites Vidhya 2003 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 16
report
-34.9 kJ/mol-atomCeC2298.15experimentalKnudsen effusionC–Ce[1] Peng 2011
cites Faircloth 1968 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 15
report
-32.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.8CeC2298.15experimentalBomb calorimetryC–Ce[1] Peng 2011
cites Baker 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 14
report
-31.3 kJ/mol-atomCeC2298.15experimentalControlled CO pressureC–Ce[1] Peng 2011
cites Pialoux 1988 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 13
report
-29.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.5CeC2298.15experimentalemfC–Ce[1] Peng 2011
cites Anderson 2011
Table 2, p. 2, row 12
report
-27.2 kJ/mol-atomCeC2298.15experimentalKnudsen cell MSC–Ce[1] Peng 2011
cites Winchell 1967 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 10
report
-25.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.4CeC2298.15experimentalSynthesis calorimetryC–Ce[1] Peng 2011
cites Meschel 1995 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 11
report
-20.9 kJ/mol-atom ± 7CeC2298.15experimentalKnudsen cell MSC–Ce[1] Peng 2011
cites Balducci 1969
Table 2, p. 2, row 9
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of CeC2
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-40.03kJ/mol-atom3.70.0054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)4.2
-34.9kJ/mol-atom0.054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)4.2
-32.4kJ/mol-atom1.80.051 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1.8
-31.3kJ/mol-atom0.054.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold)4.1
-29.5kJ/mol-atom3.50.054.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold)4.6
-27.2kJ/mol-atom0.054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)4.2
-25.4kJ/mol-atom1.40.053.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-20.9kJ/mol-atom70.054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)7

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of CeC2
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaaeff-15.378-0.159383I4/mmm5.17660.0537no
OQMDoqmd-13373-8.01-0.08302I4/mmm1.22540.0127no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Yingbiao Peng, Yong Du, Lijun Zhang, Chunsheng Sha, Shuhong Liu, Feng Zheng et al., Thermodynamic modeling of the C–RE (RE=La, Ce and Pr) systems, Calphad 35, 533-541 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.002