CeC2: enthalpy of formation
8 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 8); experimental median -30.4 kJ/mol-atom (n = 8); Materials Project -15.378 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaeff); OQMD -8.01 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-13373).
Systems: C–Ce
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -40.03 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.7 | CeC2 | 298.15 | experimental | Dynamic effusion MS | C–Ce | [1] Peng 2011 cites Vidhya 2003 doi | Table 2, p. 2, row 16 report | |
| -34.9 kJ/mol-atom | CeC2 | 298.15 | experimental | Knudsen effusion | C–Ce | [1] Peng 2011 cites Faircloth 1968 doi | Table 2, p. 2, row 15 report | |
| -32.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.8 | CeC2 | 298.15 | experimental | Bomb calorimetry | C–Ce | [1] Peng 2011 cites Baker 1971 doi | Table 2, p. 2, row 14 report | |
| -31.3 kJ/mol-atom | CeC2 | 298.15 | experimental | Controlled CO pressure | C–Ce | [1] Peng 2011 cites Pialoux 1988 doi | Table 2, p. 2, row 13 report | |
| -29.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.5 | CeC2 | 298.15 | experimental | emf | C–Ce | [1] Peng 2011 cites Anderson 2011 | Table 2, p. 2, row 12 report | |
| -27.2 kJ/mol-atom | CeC2 | 298.15 | experimental | Knudsen cell MS | C–Ce | [1] Peng 2011 cites Winchell 1967 doi | Table 2, p. 2, row 10 report | |
| -25.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.4 | CeC2 | 298.15 | experimental | Synthesis calorimetry | C–Ce | [1] Peng 2011 cites Meschel 1995 doi | Table 2, p. 2, row 11 report | |
| -20.9 kJ/mol-atom ± 7 | CeC2 | 298.15 | experimental | Knudsen cell MS | C–Ce | [1] Peng 2011 cites Balducci 1969 | Table 2, p. 2, row 9 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -40.03 | kJ/mol-atom | 3.7 | 0.005 | 4.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated) | 4.2 | |||
| -34.9 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 4.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated) | 4.2 | ||||
| -32.4 | kJ/mol-atom | 1.8 | 0.05 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1.8 | |||
| -31.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | ||||
| -29.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 3.5 | 0.05 | 4.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.6 | |||
| -27.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 4.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated) | 4.2 | ||||
| -25.4 | kJ/mol-atom | 1.4 | 0.05 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 3.2 | |||
| -20.9 | kJ/mol-atom | 7 | 0.05 | 4.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated) | 7 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaaeff | -15.378 | -0.159383 | I4/mmm | 5.1766 | 0.0537 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-13373 | -8.01 | -0.08302 | I4/mmm | 1.2254 | 0.0127 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Yingbiao Peng, Yong Du, Lijun Zhang, Chunsheng Sha, Shuhong Liu, Feng Zheng et al., Thermodynamic modeling of the C–RE (RE=La, Ce and Pr) systems, Calphad 35, 533-541 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.002