Cr2Ta: enthalpy of formation

5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 2, model 3); experimental median -8.5 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1); Materials Project -11.01 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaadnt); OQMD -12.142 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-18299).

Systems: Cr–Ta

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Cr2Ta reported in the literature (5)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-8.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.5Cr2Ta (LT)1693experimentalCr–Ta[1] Dupin 1993
cites Feschotte 1964 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
-8.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated)Cr2Ta C14298.15experimentalExperimentCr–Ta[2] Pavlů 2009
cites Feschotte 1964
Table 4, p. 4, row 5
report
-8.93 kJ/mol-atomCr2Ta (LT)modelCr–Ta[1] Dupin 1993Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
-8.596 kJ/mol-atomCr2Ta (LT)modelCr–Ta[1] Dupin 1993Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
-5 kJ/mol-atomCr2Ta (LT)1693modelCr–Ta[1] Dupin 1993
cites Kaufman 1991 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Cr2Ta
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-8.5kJ/mol-atom0.55.000e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-8.5kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.0512.3 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold)12.3
-8.93kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-8.596kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-5kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Cr2Ta
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaadnt-11.01-0.114112Fd-3m00no
OQMDoqmd-18299-12.142-0.125838Fd-3m00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. N. Dupin, I. Ansara, Thermodynamic assessment of the Cr-Ta system, JPE 14, 451-456 (1993). doi:10.1007/bf02671963
  2. J. Pavlů, J. Vřešt’ál, M. Šob, Re-modeling of Laves phases in the Cr–Nb and Cr–Ta systems using first-principles results, Calphad 33, 179-186 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2008.04.006