CsO2: enthalpy of formation

8 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 2, DFT 3, unspecified 2); experimental median -78.3 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1); Materials Project -94.541 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaacdl); OQMD -103.292 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-6963).

Systems: Cs–O

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of CsO2 reported in the literature (8)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-78.3 kJ/mol-atomCsO2298.15experimentalCs–O[1] Guéneau 2015
cites Knights 1979 doi
Table 5, p. 7, row 34
report
-95.4 kJ/mol-atomCsO2298.15modelCs–O[1] Guéneau 2015
cites SGTE doi
Table 5, p. 7, row 32
report
-80.4667 kJ/mol-atomCsO2298.15modelCALPHADCs–O[1] Guéneau 2015Table 5, p. 7, row 35
report
-129.533 kJ/mol-atomCsO20DFTDFTCs–O[1] Guéneau 2015
cites Jain 2010 doi
Table 5, p. 7, row 29
report
-117.067 kJ/mol-atomCsO20DFTDFTCs–O[1] Guéneau 2015
cites Brillant 2009
Table 5, p. 7, row 30
report
-84.2667 kJ/mol-atomCsO2298.15DFTDFTCs–O[1] Guéneau 2015Table 5, p. 7, row 28
report
-95.4 kJ/mol-atomCsO2298.15unspecifiedCs–O[1] Guéneau 2015
cites Lamoreaux 1984 doi
Table 5, p. 7, row 33
report
-77.7 kJ/mol-atomCsO2298.15unspecifiedCs–O[1] Guéneau 2015
cites Cordfunke 1990
Table 5, p. 7, row 31
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of CsO2
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-78.3kJ/mol-atom0.016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-95.4kJ/mol-atom0.016673.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-80.4667kJ/mol-atom0.016673.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-129.533kJ/mol-atom0.016679.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-117.067kJ/mol-atom0.016679.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-84.2667kJ/mol-atom0.016679.966 (dft, calibrated)9.966
-95.4kJ/mol-atom0.016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-77.7kJ/mol-atom0.016673.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of CsO2
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaacdl-94.541-0.979847I4/mmm00no
OQMDoqmd-6963-103.292-1.07055I4/mmm00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. C. Guéneau, J.-L. Flèche, Thermodynamic assessment of the cesium–oxygen system by coupling density functional theory and CALPHAD approaches, Calphad 49, 67-78 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2015.02.002