Cu2O: enthalpy of formation

8 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 5, model 3); experimental median -56.943 kJ/mol-atom (n = 5); Materials Project -62.185 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaanx); OQMD -66.037 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-643065).

Systems: Cu–O

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Cu2O reported in the literature (8)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-59.97 kJ/mol-atomCu2O298.15experimentalCal.Cu–O[1] Hallstedt 1994
cites Wrhler 1934
Table 8, p. 13, row 4
report
-57.7267 kJ/mol-atomCu2O298.15experimentalReact. Cal.Cu–O[1] Hallstedt 1994
cites Nufiez 1969
Table 8, p. 13, row 10
report
-56.9433 kJ/mol-atomCu2O298.15experimentalReact. Cal.Cu–O[1] Hallstedt 1994
cites Mah 1967
Table 8, p. 13, row 8
report
-56.7633 kJ/mol-atomCu2O298.15experimentalAq. Cal.Cu–O[1] Hallstedt 1994
cites Thomsen 1883
Table 8, p. 13, row 1
report
-54.95 kJ/mol-atomCu2O293experimentalSol. Cal.Cu–O[1] Hallstedt 1994
cites ref. 34Bil
Table 8, p. 13, row 6
report
-57.4933 kJ/mol-atomCu2O298.15modelAssessedCu–O[1] Hallstedt 1994
cites Boud 1991
Table 8, p. 13, row 15
report
-56.9033 kJ/mol-atomCu2O298.15modelAssessedCu–O[1] Hallstedt 1994
cites Chase 1985
Table 8, p. 13, row 13
report
-56.7533 kJ/mol-atomCu2O298.15modelAssessedCu–O[1] Hallstedt 1994Table 8, p. 13, row 17
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Cu2O
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-59.97kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-57.7267kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-56.9433kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-56.7633kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-54.95kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-57.4933kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-56.9033kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-56.7533kJ/mol-atom0.0016673.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Cu2O
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaaanx-62.185-0.644505Pn-3m00no
OQMDoqmd-643065-66.037-0.684424Pn-3m00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. B. Hallstedt, D. Risold, L. J. Gauckler, Thermodynamic assessment of the copper-oxygen system, JPE 15, 483-499 (1994). doi:10.1007/bf02649399