ErGe2: enthalpy of formation
9 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 3, model 6); experimental median -69.5 kJ/mol-atom (n = 3); OQMD -27.011 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1591438).
Systems: Er–Ge
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -69.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 1 | LT_ErGe2 | 950 | experimental | EMF | Er–Ge | [1] Achgar 2017 cites Sidorko 2008 | Table 5, p. 7, row 25 report | |
| -69.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 1 | MT_ErGe2 | 950 | experimental | EMF | Er–Ge | [1] Achgar 2017 cites Sidorko 2008 | Table 5, p. 7, row 28 report | |
| -69.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 1 | HT_ErGe2 | 950 | experimental | EMF | Er–Ge | [1] Achgar 2017 cites Sidorko 2008 | Table 5, p. 7, row 31 report | |
| -73.95 kJ/mol-atom | LT_ErGe2 | 950 | model | Optimization | Er–Ge | [1] Achgar 2017 | Table 5, p. 7, row 27 report | |
| -73.88 kJ/mol-atom | MT_ErGe2 | 950 | model | Optimization | Er–Ge | [1] Achgar 2017 | Table 5, p. 7, row 30 report | |
| -73.87 kJ/mol-atom | LT_ErGe2 | 950 | model | Optimization | Er–Ge | [1] Achgar 2017 | Table 5, p. 7, row 26 report | |
| -73.87 kJ/mol-atom | MT_ErGe2 | 950 | model | Optimization | Er–Ge | [1] Achgar 2017 | Table 5, p. 7, row 29 report | |
| -73.63 kJ/mol-atom | HT_ErGe2 | 950 | model | Optimization | Er–Ge | [1] Achgar 2017 | Table 5, p. 7, row 33 report | |
| -73.51 kJ/mol-atom | HT_ErGe2 | 950 | model | Optimization | Er–Ge | [1] Achgar 2017 | Table 5, p. 7, row 32 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -69.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 1 | 0.05 | 4.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.6 | |||
| -69.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 1 | 0.05 | 4.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.6 | |||
| -69.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 1 | 0.05 | 4.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.6 | |||
| -73.95 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -73.88 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -73.87 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -73.87 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -73.63 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -73.51 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OQMD | oqmd-1591438 | -27.011 | -0.279951 | Fd-3m | 31.1064 | 0.3224 | yes |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Lahcen Bouirden, Thermodynamic optimization of the Erbium-Germanium binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 724, 1157-1166 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.129