ErGe2: enthalpy of formation

9 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 3, model 6); experimental median -69.5 kJ/mol-atom (n = 3); OQMD -27.011 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1591438).

Systems: Er–Ge

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of ErGe2 reported in the literature (9)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-69.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 1LT_ErGe2950experimentalEMFEr–Ge[1] Achgar 2017
cites Sidorko 2008
Table 5, p. 7, row 25
report
-69.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 1MT_ErGe2950experimentalEMFEr–Ge[1] Achgar 2017
cites Sidorko 2008
Table 5, p. 7, row 28
report
-69.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 1HT_ErGe2950experimentalEMFEr–Ge[1] Achgar 2017
cites Sidorko 2008
Table 5, p. 7, row 31
report
-73.95 kJ/mol-atomLT_ErGe2950modelOptimizationEr–Ge[1] Achgar 2017Table 5, p. 7, row 27
report
-73.88 kJ/mol-atomMT_ErGe2950modelOptimizationEr–Ge[1] Achgar 2017Table 5, p. 7, row 30
report
-73.87 kJ/mol-atomLT_ErGe2950modelOptimizationEr–Ge[1] Achgar 2017Table 5, p. 7, row 26
report
-73.87 kJ/mol-atomMT_ErGe2950modelOptimizationEr–Ge[1] Achgar 2017Table 5, p. 7, row 29
report
-73.63 kJ/mol-atomHT_ErGe2950modelOptimizationEr–Ge[1] Achgar 2017Table 5, p. 7, row 33
report
-73.51 kJ/mol-atomHT_ErGe2950modelOptimizationEr–Ge[1] Achgar 2017Table 5, p. 7, row 32
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of ErGe2
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-69.5kJ/mol-atom10.054.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold)4.6
-69.5kJ/mol-atom10.054.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold)4.6
-69.5kJ/mol-atom10.054.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold)4.6
-73.95kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-73.88kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-73.87kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-73.87kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-73.63kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-73.51kJ/mol-atom0.0053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of ErGe2
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
OQMDoqmd-1591438-27.011-0.279951Fd-3m31.10640.3224yes

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Lahcen Bouirden, Thermodynamic optimization of the Erbium-Germanium binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 724, 1157-1166 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.129