ErTe: enthalpy of formation
6 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 2, model 1, DFT 3); experimental median -168.225 kJ/mol-atom (n = 2); Materials Project -136.706 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaabxg); OQMD -120.964 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1880751).
Systems: Er–Te
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -179.45 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.6 | ErTe | 298.15 | experimental | EMF | Er–Te | [1] Bennoui 2022 cites Imamaliyeva 2020 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 40 report | |
| -157 kJ/mol-atom ± 60 | ErTe | 298.15 | experimental | EMF | Er–Te | [1] Bennoui 2022 cites Mills 1974 | Table 2, p. 5, row 41 report | |
| -118.947 kJ/mol-atom | ErTe | model | CALPHAD | Er–Te | [1] Bennoui 2022 | Table 2, p. 5, row 37 report | ||
| -136.485 kJ/mol-atom | ErTe | 0 | DFT | DFT | Er–Te | [1] Bennoui 2022 cites Jain 2013 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 39 report | |
| -119.399 kJ/mol-atom | ErTe | 0 | DFT | DFT | Er–Te | [1] Bennoui 2022 cites Kirklin 2015 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 38 report | |
| -115.927 kJ/mol-atom | ErTe | 0 | DFT | DFT | Er–Te | [1] Bennoui 2022 | Table 2, p. 5, row 36 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -179.45 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.6 | 0.005 | 4.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.6 | |||
| -157 | kJ/mol-atom | 60 | 0.05 | 4.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 60 | |||
| -118.947 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -136.485 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 | ||||
| -119.399 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 | ||||
| -115.927 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaabxg | -136.706 | -1.41686 | Fm-3m | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-1880751 | -120.964 | -1.25371 | P63/mmc | 0 | 0 | yes |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- S. Bennoui, Y. Djaballah, V. Vassiliev, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Thermodynamic Study of Er-Bi and Er-Te Systems by Combination of First-Principles Calculations and the CALPHAD Method, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 43, 126-138 (2022). doi:10.1007/s11669-022-00947-8