Ga3Ho: enthalpy of formation
6 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 2, model 4); experimental median -57.3 kJ/mol-atom (n = 2); Materials Project -51.381 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaadzk); OQMD -50.392 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-27370).
Systems: Ga–Ho
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -57.8 kJ/mol-atom | HoGa3 | 681.575 | experimental | Emf (660 – 1065 K) | Ga–Ho | [1] Boukideur 2020 cites Colinet 1994 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report | |
| -56.8 kJ/mol-atom | HoGa3 | 298.15 | experimental | Dir.Syn.Calo 1373±2 K | Ga–Ho | [1] Boukideur 2020 cites Meschel 2001 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report | |
| -56.8 kJ/mol-atom | HoGa3 | 298.15 | model | Optimization[R-K] | Ga–Ho | [1] Boukideur 2020 | Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report | |
| -56.8 kJ/mol-atom | HoGa3 | 298.15 | model | Optimization[A] | Ga–Ho | [1] Boukideur 2020 | Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report | |
| -56.8 kJ/mol-atom | HoGa3 | 298.15 | model | Optimization[K] | Ga–Ho | [1] Boukideur 2020 | Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report | |
| -50 kJ/mol-atom | HoGa3 | 298.15 | model | Miedema’s model | Ga–Ho | [1] Boukideur 2020 cites De 2014 | Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -57.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 4.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.6 | ||||
| -56.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 3.2 | ||||
| -56.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -56.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -56.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -50 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaadzk | -51.381 | -0.532527 | Pm-3m | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-27370 | -50.392 | -0.522283 | P63/mmc | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- M. Ait Boukideur, N. Selhaoui, F. Z. Chrifi Alaoui, A. Iddaoudi, K. Achgar, S. Kardellass, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ho–Ga system, J Therm Anal Calorim 139, 3623-3633 (2020). doi:10.1007/s10973-019-08689-5