Ge3Yb5: enthalpy of formation

6 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 2, model 3, DFT 1); experimental median -69.45 kJ/mol-atom (n = 2); OQMD -65.764 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1437177).

Systems: Ge–Yb

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Ge3Yb5 reported in the literature (6)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-69.7 kJ/mol-atom ± 8.2Yb5Ge3298.15experimentalKEWL and KEMSGe–Yb[1] Achgar 2018
cites Balducci 2007 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 4
report
-69.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 8.2Yb5Ge3298.15experimentalKE techniqueGe–Yb[2] Dai-man 2018
cites Balducci 2007
Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
-72.5 kJ/mol-atomYb5Ge3298.15modelSCMGe–Yb[2] Dai-man 2018Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
-69.1 kJ/mol-atomYb5Ge3modelOptimizationGe–Yb[1] Achgar 2018Table 2, p. 5, row 5
report
-68.649 kJ/mol-atomYb5Ge3modelOptimizationGe–Yb[1] Achgar 2018Table 2, p. 5, row 6
report
-65 kJ/mol-atomYb5Ge30DFTDFT calculationGe–Yb[2] Dai-man 2018
cites Saal 2013
Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Ge3Yb5
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-69.7kJ/mol-atom8.20.054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)8.2
-69.2kJ/mol-atom8.20.054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)8.2
-72.5kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-69.1kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-68.649kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-65kJ/mol-atom0.058.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Ge3Yb5
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
OQMDoqmd-1437177-65.764-0.681599I4/mcm0.87660.0091yes

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x
  2. Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018). doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217