Li3Sb: enthalpy of formation

5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 4, model 1); experimental median -74.287 kJ/mol-atom (n = 4); Materials Project -65.598 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaadbu); OQMD -61.983 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-646185).

Systems: Li–Sb

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Li3Sb reported in the literature (5)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-81.5 kJ/mol-atomLi3Sb298.15experimentalacid solution calorimetryLi–Sb[1] Li 2017
cites Shchukarev 1954
Table 1, p. 3, row 1
report
-75.25 kJ/mol-atomLi3Sb686.65experimentalLi–Sb[2] Zhang 2017
cites ref. 14
Table 5, p. 36, row 5
report
-73.325 kJ/mol-atomLi3Sb700.65experimentalLi–Sb[2] Zhang 2017
cites ref. 10
Table 5, p. 36, row 4
report
-70.03 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.3Li3Sb942experimentaldirect reaction calorimetryLi–Sb[1] Li 2017
cites Terlicka 2016 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 2
report
-76.825 kJ/mol-atomLi3Sb700.65modelLi–Sb[2] Zhang 2017Table 5, p. 36, row 6
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Li3Sb
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-81.5kJ/mol-atom0.053.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-75.25kJ/mol-atom0.1253.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-73.325kJ/mol-atom0.01253.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-70.03kJ/mol-atom0.30.0053.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-76.825kJ/mol-atom0.01253.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Li3Sb
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaadbu-65.598-0.679877Fm-3m00no
OQMDoqmd-646185-61.983-0.64241Fm-3m00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. D. Li, A. Beutl, H. Flandorfer, D.M. Cupid, The Li-Sb phase diagram part II: Calorimetry and thermodynamic assessment, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 701, 186-199 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.399
  2. Fan Zhang, Shuhong Liu, Jianchuan Wang, Yong Du, Lixian Sun, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic assessment of the Li-Sb system, Calphad 57, 28-36 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2017.01.005