MgB2: enthalpy of formation

15 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 11, model 4); experimental median -18.6 kJ/mol-atom (n = 7); Materials Project -12.577 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaabdj); OQMD -13.509 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-98302).

Systems: B–Mg

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of MgB2 reported in the literature (15)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-41.1 per mol-atom ± 2.2MgB2298.15experimentalVap. p.B–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
-41.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.2MgB2298.15experimentalVap. p.B–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
-26.66 kJ/mol-atom ± 10MgB2298.15experimentalvapor pressureB–Mg[2] Liu 2001
cites Jansson 1984
Table 2, p. 2, row 1
report
-26.6 per mol-atom ± 10MgB2298.15experimentalVap. p.B–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
-26.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 10MgB2298.15experimentalVap. p.B–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
-18.6 kJ/mol-atomMgB2298.15experimentalcalorimetryB–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
-18.6 per mol-atomMgB2298.15experimentalcalorimetryB–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
-18.55 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.12MgB2298.15experimentalcalorimetryB–Mg[2] Liu 2001
cites Sundman 1985 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 7
report
-17.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.4MgB2298.15experimentalcalorimetryB–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
-17.2 per mol-atom ± 1.4MgB2298.15experimentalcalorimetryB–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
-17.17 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.39MgB2298.15experimentalcalorimetryB–Mg[2] Liu 2001
cites Jansson 1984
Table 2, p. 2, row 4
report
-35.9 kJ/mol-atomMgB2298.15modelPh. diagr. assessmentB–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
-35.9 per mol-atomMgB2298.15modelPh. diagr. assessmentB–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
-24 kJ/mol-atomMgB2298.15modelPh. diagr. assessmentB–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
-24 per mol-atomMgB2298.15modelPh. diagr. assessmentB–Mg[1] Balducci 2005Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of MgB2
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-41.1per mol-atom2.20.05unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom2.2
-41.1kJ/mol-atom2.20.054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)4.2
-26.66kJ/mol-atom100.0054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)10
-26.6per mol-atom100.05unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom10
-26.6kJ/mol-atom100.054.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)10
-18.6kJ/mol-atom0.053.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-18.6per mol-atom0.05unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-18.55kJ/mol-atom1.120.0053.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-17.2kJ/mol-atom1.40.053.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-17.2per mol-atom1.40.05unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom1.4
-17.17kJ/mol-atom1.390.0053.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-35.9kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-35.9per mol-atom0.05unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom
-24kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-24per mol-atom0.05unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atomunit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of MgB2
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaabdj-12.577-0.130355P6/mmm00no
OQMDoqmd-98302-13.509-0.140012P6/mmm00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. G. Balducci, S. Brutti, A. Ciccioli, G. Gigli, P. Manfrinetti, A. Palenzona et al., Thermodynamics of the intermediate phases in the Mg–B system, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 66, 292-297 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2004.06.063
  2. Zi-Kui Liu, Yu Zhong, D.G. Schlom, X.X. Xi, Qi Li, Computational thermodynamic modeling of the Mg-B system, Calphad 25, 299-303 (2001). doi:10.1016/s0364-5916(01)00050-5