MgO: enthalpy of formation
5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 1, DFT 3); Materials Project -294.608 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaabwr); OQMD -284.268 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1443261).
Systems: Mg–O
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -602 kJ/(mol 0) | MgO | 298.15 | experimental | Mg–O | [1] Hallstedt 1993 cites Fikner | p. 5 report | However, Fikner [5J and Otsuka and Kozuka [6J have found correlations between the enthalpy and entropy of dissolution of 0 into liquid metals and the enthalpy of formation of the oxide at 298 K. Using the expressions provided by Fitzner I5J with the enthalpy of formation of MgO (A?&s = -602 kJ/(mol 0)) gives A"G = -500000 + 90T J/mol for dissolution of 0 in liquid Mg (1 mol-W standard state). | |
| -300.62 kJ/mol-atom | MgO | model | Mg–O | [2] Li 2023 | Table 5, p. 6, row 1 report | |||
| -282.82 kJ/mol-atom | MgO | DFT | first-principle method | Mg–O | [2] Li 2023 | Table 3, p. 5, row 2 report | ||
| -281.86 kJ/mol-atom | MgO | 0 | DFT | first-principle method | Mg–O | [2] Li 2023 | Table 3, p. 5, row 1 report | |
| -263.71 kJ/mol-atom | MgO | DFT | first-principle method | Mg–O | [2] Li 2023 | Table 3, p. 5, row 3 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -602 | kJ/(mol 0) | 0.05 | 7 (unknown, calibrated) | 7 | ||||
| -300.62 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -282.82 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 | ||||
| -281.86 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 | ||||
| -263.71 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaabwr | -294.608 | -3.0534 | Fm-3m | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-1443261 | -284.268 | -2.94624 | P21/c | 0 | 0 | yes |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Bengt Hallstedt, The Magnesium — Oxygen system, Calphad 17, 281-286 (1993). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(93)90006-w
- X.-J. Li, S.-H. Liu, Thermodynamic description of the Mg-O and Al-O systems, J min metall B Metall 59, 395-405 (2023). doi:10.2298/jmmb230621034l