Mn2O3: enthalpy of formation

18 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 4, model 14); experimental median -194.812 kJ/mol-atom (n = 4); Materials Project -194.313 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaacotap); OQMD -195.424 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-33708).

Systems: Mn–O

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Mn2O3 reported in the literature (18)
Value	Phase as printed	T (K)	Class	Method	System	Source	Location
-194.854 kJ/mol-atom	Mn2O3	298.15	experimental	combustion	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Siemonsen 1939	Table 11, p. 16, row 70 report
-194.854 kJ/mol-atom	Bixbyite (Mn2O3)	298.15	experimental	combustion	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Siemonsen 1939	Table 11, p. 16, row 25 report
-194.77 kJ/mol-atom	Bixbyite (Mn2O3)	298.15	experimental	combustion	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Ulich 1940 doi	Table 11, p. 16, row 26 report
-194.77 kJ/mol-atom	Mn2O3	298.15	experimental	combustion	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Ulich 1940 doi	Table 11, p. 16, row 71 report
-192.518 kJ/mol-atom	Bixbyite (Mn2O3)	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003	Table 11, p. 16, row 33 report
-192.518 kJ/mol-atom	Mn2O3	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003	Table 11, p. 16, row 78 report
-191.922 kJ/mol-atom	Mn2O3	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Pankratz 1982	Table 11, p. 16, row 75 report
-191.922 kJ/mol-atom	Bixbyite (Mn2O3)	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Pankratz 1982	Table 11, p. 16, row 30 report
-191.922 kJ/mol-atom	Mn2O3	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Brewer 1953 doi	Table 11, p. 16, row 72 report
-191.922 kJ/mol-atom	Bixbyite (Mn2O3)	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Brewer 1953 doi	Table 11, p. 16, row 27 report
-191.8 kJ/mol-atom	Bixbyite (Mn2O3)	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Knacke 1991	Table 11, p. 16, row 31 report
-191.8 kJ/mol-atom	Mn2O3	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Knacke 1991	Table 11, p. 16, row 76 report
-191.62 kJ/mol-atom	Bixbyite (Mn2O3)	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Kubaschewski 1993	Table 11, p. 16, row 32 report
-191.62 kJ/mol-atom	Mn2O3	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Kubaschewski 1993	Table 11, p. 16, row 77 report
-191.504 kJ/mol-atom	Mn2O3	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Zordan 1968 doi	Table 11, p. 16, row 74 report
-191.504 kJ/mol-atom	Bixbyite (Mn2O3)	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Zordan 1968 doi	Table 11, p. 16, row 29 report
-191.254 kJ/mol-atom	Mn2O3	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Mah 1960	Table 11, p. 16, row 73 report
-191.254 kJ/mol-atom	Bixbyite (Mn2O3)	298.15	model	assessed	Mn–O	[1] Grundy 2003 cites Mah 1960	Table 11, p. 16, row 28 report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Mn2O3
Value	Unit	Reading	Method (class, basis)	Effective
-194.854	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)	1
-194.854	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)	1
-194.77	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)	1
-194.77	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)	1
-192.518	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-192.518	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.922	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.922	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.922	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.922	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.8	kJ/mol-atom	0.01	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.8	kJ/mol-atom	0.01	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.62	kJ/mol-atom	0.01	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.62	kJ/mol-atom	0.01	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.504	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.504	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.254	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-191.254	kJ/mol-atom	0.001	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Mn2O3
Source	Entry	kJ/mol-atom	eV/atom	Space group	E above hull (kJ/mol-atom)	E above hull (eV/atom)	Theoretical
Materials Project	mp-aaacotap	-194.313	-2.01392	Pbca	0	0	no
OQMD	oqmd-33708	-195.424	-2.02544	Pbca	0	0	no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

A. Nicholas Grundy, Bengt Hallstedt, Ludwig J. Gauckler, Assessment of the Mn-O system, JPE 24, 21-39 (2003). doi:10.1007/s11669-003-0004-6

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735943
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); G. Kim, S. V. Meschel, P. Nash, W. Chen, Experimental formation enthalpies for intermetallic phases and other inorganic compounds, Scientific Data 4 (2017) 170162, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.162; B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file. Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_dft_benchmark_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735943},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735943},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}