Mn3O4: enthalpy of formation
37 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 19, model 14, unspecified 4); experimental median -196.78 kJ/mol-atom (n = 19); Materials Project -197.834 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaabbtn); OQMD -200.053 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-5975).
Systems: Mn–O
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -206.35 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Roth 1929 doi | Table 11, p. 16, row 15 report | |
| -206.35 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Roth 1929 doi | Table 11, p. 16, row 60 report | |
| -201.266 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Siemonsen 1939 | Table 11, p. 16, row 16 report | |
| -201.266 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Siemonsen 1939 | Table 11, p. 16, row 61 report | |
| -201.206 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Ulich 1940 doi | Table 11, p. 16, row 17 report | |
| -201.206 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Ulich 1940 doi | Table 11, p. 16, row 62 report | |
| -198.364 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | experimental | solution | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Shomate 1943 doi | Table 11, p. 16, row 18 report | |
| -198.364 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | solution | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Shomate 1943 doi | Table 11, p. 16, row 63 report | |
| -196.78 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Ruff 1913 doi | Table 11, p. 16, row 59 report | |
| -196.78 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Ruff 1913 doi | Table 11, p. 16, row 14 report | |
| -196.181 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Le 1896 | Table 11, p. 16, row 58 report | |
| -196.181 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | experimental | combustion | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Le 1896 | Table 11, p. 16, row 13 report | |
| 196.181 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Le 1896 | Table 1, p. 5, row 1 report | ||
| 196.78 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Ruff 1913 doi | Table 1, p. 5, row 2 report | ||
| 198.156 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Mah 1960 | Table 1, p. 5, row 7 report | ||
| 198.216 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Robie 1968 | Table 1, p. 5, row 8 report | ||
| 198.364 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Shomate 1943 doi | Table 1, p. 5, row 6 report | ||
| 201.266 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Siemonsen 1939 | Table 1, p. 5, row 4 report | ||
| 206.35 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | experimental | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Roth 1929 doi | Table 1, p. 5, row 3 report | ||
| -198.397 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Pankratz 1982 | Table 11, p. 16, row 21 report | |
| -198.397 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Pankratz 1982 | Table 11, p. 16, row 66 report | |
| -198.216 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Robie 1968 | Table 11, p. 16, row 20 report | |
| -198.216 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Robie 1968 | Table 11, p. 16, row 65 report | |
| -198.2 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Kubaschewski 1993 | Table 11, p. 16, row 68 report | |
| -198.2 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Kubaschewski 1993 | Table 11, p. 16, row 23 report | |
| -198.156 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Mah 1960 | Table 11, p. 16, row 19 report | |
| -198.156 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Mah 1960 | Table 11, p. 16, row 64 report | |
| -198.014 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Knacke 1991 | Table 11, p. 16, row 22 report | |
| -198.014 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 cites Knacke 1991 | Table 11, p. 16, row 67 report | |
| -197.534 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 | Table 11, p. 16, row 69 report | |
| -197.534 kJ/mol-atom | Hausmannite (Mn3O4) | 298.15 | model | assessed | Mn–O | [1] Grundy 2003 | Table 11, p. 16, row 24 report | |
| 197.534 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | model | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Grundy 2003 | Table 1, p. 5, row 12 report | ||
| 197.914 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | model | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 | Table 1, p. 5, row 13 report | ||
| 198.014 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | unspecified | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Knacke 2010 | Table 1, p. 5, row 10 report | ||
| 198.2 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | unspecified | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Kubaschewski 1993 | Table 1, p. 5, row 11 report | ||
| 198.397 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | unspecified | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Pankratz 1982 | Table 1, p. 5, row 9 report | ||
| 201.206 kJ/mol-atom | Mn3O4 | 298.15 | unspecified | Mn–O | [2] Kjellqvist 2010 cites Ulich 1940 | Table 1, p. 5, row 5 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -206.35 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| -206.35 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| -201.266 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| -201.266 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| -201.206 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| -201.206 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| -198.364 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 3.2 | ||||
| -198.364 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 3.2 | ||||
| -196.78 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| -196.78 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| -196.181 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| -196.181 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 1 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 1 | ||||
| 196.181 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 196.78 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 198.156 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 198.216 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 198.364 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 201.266 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 206.35 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -198.397 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -198.397 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -198.216 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -198.216 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -198.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.007143 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -198.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.007143 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -198.156 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -198.156 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -198.014 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.007143 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -198.014 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.007143 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -197.534 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -197.534 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| 197.534 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| 197.914 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.007143 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| 198.014 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.007143 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 198.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.007143 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 198.397 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| 201.206 | kJ/mol-atom | 7.143e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaabbtn | -197.834 | -2.05041 | I4_1/amd | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-5975 | -200.053 | -2.07341 | I41/amd | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- A. Nicholas Grundy, Bengt Hallstedt, Ludwig J. Gauckler, Assessment of the Mn-O system, JPE 24, 21-39 (2003). doi:10.1007/s11669-003-0004-6
- Lina Kjellqvist, Malin Selleby, Thermodynamic Assessment of the Fe-Mn-O System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 31, 113-134 (2010). doi:10.1007/s11669-009-9643-6