Mn3O4: enthalpy of formation

37 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 19, model 14, unspecified 4); experimental median -196.78 kJ/mol-atom (n = 19); Materials Project -197.834 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaabbtn); OQMD -200.053 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-5975).

Systems: Mn–O

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Mn3O4 reported in the literature (37)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-206.35 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Roth 1929 doi
Table 11, p. 16, row 15
report
-206.35 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Roth 1929 doi
Table 11, p. 16, row 60
report
-201.266 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Siemonsen 1939
Table 11, p. 16, row 16
report
-201.266 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Siemonsen 1939
Table 11, p. 16, row 61
report
-201.206 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Ulich 1940 doi
Table 11, p. 16, row 17
report
-201.206 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Ulich 1940 doi
Table 11, p. 16, row 62
report
-198.364 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15experimentalsolutionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Shomate 1943 doi
Table 11, p. 16, row 18
report
-198.364 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalsolutionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Shomate 1943 doi
Table 11, p. 16, row 63
report
-196.78 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Ruff 1913 doi
Table 11, p. 16, row 59
report
-196.78 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Ruff 1913 doi
Table 11, p. 16, row 14
report
-196.181 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Le 1896
Table 11, p. 16, row 58
report
-196.181 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15experimentalcombustionMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Le 1896
Table 11, p. 16, row 13
report
196.181 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Le 1896
Table 1, p. 5, row 1
report
196.78 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Ruff 1913 doi
Table 1, p. 5, row 2
report
198.156 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Mah 1960
Table 1, p. 5, row 7
report
198.216 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Robie 1968
Table 1, p. 5, row 8
report
198.364 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Shomate 1943 doi
Table 1, p. 5, row 6
report
201.266 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Siemonsen 1939
Table 1, p. 5, row 4
report
206.35 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15experimentalMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Roth 1929 doi
Table 1, p. 5, row 3
report
-198.397 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Pankratz 1982
Table 11, p. 16, row 21
report
-198.397 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Pankratz 1982
Table 11, p. 16, row 66
report
-198.216 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Robie 1968
Table 11, p. 16, row 20
report
-198.216 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Robie 1968
Table 11, p. 16, row 65
report
-198.2 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Kubaschewski 1993
Table 11, p. 16, row 68
report
-198.2 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Kubaschewski 1993
Table 11, p. 16, row 23
report
-198.156 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Mah 1960
Table 11, p. 16, row 19
report
-198.156 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Mah 1960
Table 11, p. 16, row 64
report
-198.014 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Knacke 1991
Table 11, p. 16, row 22
report
-198.014 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003
cites Knacke 1991
Table 11, p. 16, row 67
report
-197.534 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003Table 11, p. 16, row 69
report
-197.534 kJ/mol-atomHausmannite (Mn3O4)298.15modelassessedMn–O[1] Grundy 2003Table 11, p. 16, row 24
report
197.534 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15modelMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Grundy 2003
Table 1, p. 5, row 12
report
197.914 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15modelMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010Table 1, p. 5, row 13
report
198.014 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15unspecifiedMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Knacke 2010
Table 1, p. 5, row 10
report
198.2 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15unspecifiedMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Kubaschewski 1993
Table 1, p. 5, row 11
report
198.397 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15unspecifiedMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Pankratz 1982
Table 1, p. 5, row 9
report
201.206 kJ/mol-atomMn3O4298.15unspecifiedMn–O[2] Kjellqvist 2010
cites Ulich 1940
Table 1, p. 5, row 5
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Mn3O4
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-206.35kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
-206.35kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
-201.266kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
-201.266kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
-201.206kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
-201.206kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
-198.364kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-198.364kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)3.2
-196.78kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
-196.78kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
-196.181kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
-196.181kJ/mol-atom7.143e-41 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)1
196.181kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
196.78kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
198.156kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
198.216kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
198.364kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
201.266kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
206.35kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-198.397kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-198.397kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-198.216kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-198.216kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-198.2kJ/mol-atom0.0071433.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-198.2kJ/mol-atom0.0071433.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-198.156kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-198.156kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-198.014kJ/mol-atom0.0071433.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-198.014kJ/mol-atom0.0071433.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-197.534kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-197.534kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
197.534kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
197.914kJ/mol-atom0.0071433.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
198.014kJ/mol-atom0.0071433.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
198.2kJ/mol-atom0.0071433.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
198.397kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
201.206kJ/mol-atom7.143e-43.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Mn3O4
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaabbtn-197.834-2.05041I4_1/amd00no
OQMDoqmd-5975-200.053-2.07341I41/amd00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. A. Nicholas Grundy, Bengt Hallstedt, Ludwig J. Gauckler, Assessment of the Mn-O system, JPE 24, 21-39 (2003). doi:10.1007/s11669-003-0004-6
  2. Lina Kjellqvist, Malin Selleby, Thermodynamic Assessment of the Fe-Mn-O System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 31, 113-134 (2010). doi:10.1007/s11669-009-9643-6