MoN: enthalpy of formation
21 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 17, unspecified 4); Materials Project -52.788 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaeed); OQMD -45.43 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-19511).
Systems: Mo–N
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -53.7423 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites JARVIS 2020 | Table 2, p. 6, row 10 report | ||
| -53.7423 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites JARVIS 2020 | Table 2, p. 6, row 10 report | |||
| -53.742 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites JARVIS 2020 | Table 2, p. 6, row 10 report | ||
| -53.742 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites JARVIS 2020 | Table 2, p. 6, row 10 report | |||
| -51.8126 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites Materials 2019 | Table 2, p. 6, row 8 report | ||
| -51.8126 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites Materials 2019 | Table 2, p. 6, row 8 report | |||
| -51.812 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites Materials 2019 | Table 2, p. 6, row 8 report | ||
| -51.812 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites Materials 2019 | Table 2, p. 6, row 8 report | |||
| -44.2868 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites The 2019 | Table 2, p. 6, row 9 report | ||
| -44.2868 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites The 2019 | Table 2, p. 6, row 9 report | |||
| -44.286 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites The 2019 | Table 2, p. 6, row 9 report | ||
| -44.286 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites The 2019 | Table 2, p. 6, row 9 report | |||
| -39.2512 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites Klimashin 2016 doi | Table 2, p. 6, row 7 report | |||
| -39.2512 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites Klimashin 2016 doi | Table 2, p. 6, row 7 report | ||
| -39.251 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites Klimashin 2016 doi | Table 2, p. 6, row 7 report | |||
| -39.251 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | model | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 cites Klimashin 2016 doi | Table 2, p. 6, row 7 report | ||
| -24.5 kJ/mol-atom | MoN | 298.15 | model | Mo–N | [2] Frisk 1991 | Table I, p. 6, row 9 report | ||
| -37.7537 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | unspecified | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 | Table 2, p. 6, row 6 report | ||
| -37.7537 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | unspecified | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 | Table 2, p. 6, row 6 report | |||
| -37.753 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | 0 | unspecified | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 | Table 2, p. 6, row 6 report | ||
| -37.753 kJ/mol-atom | MoN-delta | unspecified | Mo–N | [1] Daclan 2023 | Table 2, p. 6, row 6 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -53.7423 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.04824 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -53.7423 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.04824 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -53.742 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -53.742 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.8126 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.04824 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.8126 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.04824 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.812 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -51.812 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -44.2868 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.04824 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -44.2868 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.04824 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -44.286 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -44.286 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -39.2512 | kJ/mol-atom | 4.824e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -39.2512 | kJ/mol-atom | 4.824e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -39.251 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -39.251 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -24.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -37.7537 | kJ/mol-atom | 4.824e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -37.7537 | kJ/mol-atom | 4.824e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -37.753 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -37.753 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaaeed | -52.788 | -0.547112 | P6_3mc | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-19511 | -45.43 | -0.470852 | P63mc | 0.0731 | 8.000e-4 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- R.A. Daclan, M.G. Mena, M.R. Vasquez, W. Gierlotka, Ab-initio combined the Calphad approach to the phase equilibria in the ternary Ti-Mo-N system, J min metall B Metall 59, 125-136 (2023). doi:10.2298/jmmb210330011d
- Karin Frisk, A thermodynamic evaluation of the Cr-N, Fe-N, Mo-N and Cr-Mo-N systems, Calphad 15, 79-106 (1991). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(91)90028-i