NaSb: enthalpy of formation

10 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 6, model 2, DFT 2); experimental median -35 kJ/mol-atom (n = 3); Materials Project -40.415 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaalto); OQMD -37.498 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-5018).

Systems: Na–Sb

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of NaSb reported in the literature (10)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-72 kJ/mol (basis unstated)NaSb(s)298.15experimentalNa–Sb[1] Liu 2013
cites Voronin 1987
Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
-70 kJ/mol (basis unstated)NaSb(s)298.15experimentalNa–Sb[1] Liu 2013
cites Voronin 1967
Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
-66 kJ/mol (basis unstated)NaSb(s)298.15experimentalNa–Sb[1] Liu 2013
cites Kubaschewski 1938
Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
-36 kJ/mol-atomNaSb(s)298.15experimentalNa–Sb[1] Liu 2013
cites Voronin 1987
Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
-35 kJ/mol-atomNaSb(s)298.15experimentalNa–Sb[1] Liu 2013
cites Voronin 1967
Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
-33 kJ/mol-atomNaSb(s)298.15experimentalNa–Sb[1] Liu 2013
cites Kubaschewski 1938
Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
-75 kJ/mol (basis unstated)NaSb(s)modelNa–Sb[1] Liu 2013Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
-37.5 kJ/mol-atomNaSb(s)modelNa–Sb[1] Liu 2013Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
-0.679 eVNaSb0DFTDFTNa–Sb[2] Dreval 2017Table 3, p. 7, row 21
report
-0.663 eVNaSb0DFTDFTNa–Sb[2] Dreval 2017Table 3, p. 7, row 22
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of NaSb
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-72kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.57 (unknown, calibrated)7
-70kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.57 (unknown, calibrated)7
-66kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.57 (unknown, calibrated)7
-36kJ/mol-atom0.253.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-35kJ/mol-atom0.253.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-33kJ/mol-atom0.253.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-75kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.57.8 (model_calculated, calibrated)7.8
-37.5kJ/mol-atom0.253.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-0.679eV5.000e-40.2066 (dft, calibrated)0.2066
-0.663eV5.000e-40.2066 (dft, calibrated)0.2066

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of NaSb
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaalto-40.415-0.418877P2_1/c00no
OQMDoqmd-5018-37.498-0.388645P21/c00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Yajun Liu, Jun Xu, Zhitao Kang, Jiang Wang, Thermodynamic descriptions and phase diagrams for Sb–Na and Sb–K binary systems, Thermochimica Acta 569, 119-126 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.07.009
  2. Liya Dreval, Matthias Zschornak, Wolfram Münchgesang, Olga Fabrichnaya, David Rafaja, Miléna L. Martine et al., Thermodynamic assessment and first principle calculations of the Na Sb Sn system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 695, 1725-1742 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.003