Ni3Sn2: enthalpy of formation
21 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 11, model 8, unspecified 2).
Systems: Ni–Sn
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -38.644 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2_HT | 1023 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [1] Liu 2004 cites Dannohl 1974 | Table 3, p. 5, row 10 report | ||
| -38.644 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | η-Ni3Sn2 | 1023 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [2] Ghosh 1999 cites Dannohl 1974 | Table III, p. 12, row 9 report | ||
| -38.52 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2(η) | 298.15 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [3] Miettinen 2003 cites Predel 1972 doi | Table 5, p. 5, row 6 report | ||
| -38.519 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | λ-Ni3Sn2 | 298.15 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [2] Ghosh 1999 cites Predel 1972 | Table III, p. 12, row 5 report | ||
| -38.519 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2_LT | 298.15 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [1] Liu 2004 cites Predel 1972 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 6 report | ||
| -31.79 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2_LT | 298.15 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [1] Liu 2004 cites Predel 1979 | Table 3, p. 5, row 7 report | ||
| -31.79 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2(η) | 298.15 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [3] Miettinen 2003 cites Predel 1979 doi | Table 5, p. 5, row 5 report | ||
| -31.79 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | λ-Ni3Sn2 | 298.15 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [2] Ghosh 1999 cites Predel 1979 | Table III, p. 12, row 6 report | ||
| -31.38 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2(η) | 298.15 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [3] Miettinen 2003 cites Korber 1937 | Table 5, p. 5, row 7 report | ||
| -31.28 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2_LT | 273 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [1] Liu 2004 cites Korber 1937 | Table 3, p. 5, row 4 report | ||
| -31.28 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | λ-Ni3Sn2 | 273 | experimental | Ni–Sn | [2] Ghosh 1999 cites Koerber 1937 | Table III, p. 12, row 4 report | ||
| -32.871 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2_HT | 1023 | model | Ni–Sn | [1] Liu 2004 cites Ghosh 1999 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 11 report | ||
| -32.714 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2_HT | 1023 | model | Ni–Sn | [1] Liu 2004 | Table 3, p. 5, row 12 report | ||
| -31.79 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2(η) | 298.15 | model | Ni–Sn | [3] Miettinen 2003 | Table 5, p. 5, row 9 report | ||
| -30.322 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2_LT | 298.15 | model | Ni–Sn | [1] Liu 2004 cites Ghosh 1999 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 8 report | ||
| -30.32 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2(η) | 298.15 | model | Ni–Sn | [3] Miettinen 2003 cites Ghosh 1999 doi | Table 5, p. 5, row 8 report | ||
| -28.868 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2_LT | 298.15 | model | Ni–Sn | [1] Liu 2004 | Table 3, p. 5, row 9 report | ||
| -28.854 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Ni3Sn2_LT | 273 | model | Ni–Sn | [1] Liu 2004 | Table 3, p. 5, row 5 report | ||
| -24 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | λ-Ni3Sn2 | 298.15 | model | Ni–Sn | [2] Ghosh 1999 cites F 1988 | Table III, p. 12, row 7 report | ||
| -32.871 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | η-Ni3Sn2 | 1023 | unspecified | Ni–Sn | [2] Ghosh 1999 | Table III, p. 12, row 10 report | ||
| -30.322 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | λ-Ni3Sn2 | 298.15 | unspecified | Ni–Sn | [2] Ghosh 1999 | Table III, p. 12, row 8 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -38.644 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -38.644 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -38.52 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -38.519 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -38.519 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -31.79 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -31.79 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -31.79 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -31.38 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -31.28 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -31.28 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -32.871 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -32.714 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -31.79 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -30.322 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -30.32 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.005 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -28.868 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -28.854 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -24 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.5 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -32.871 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -30.322 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 17.5 |
Sources
- H.S. Liu, J. Wang, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic optimization of the Ni–Sn binary system, Calphad 28, 363-370 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2004.12.002
- G. Ghosh, Thermodynamic modeling of the nickel-lead-tin system, Metall Mater Trans A 30, 1481-1494 (1999). doi:10.1007/s11661-999-0085-x
- Jyrki Miettinen, Thermodynamic description of the Cu–Ni–Sn system at the Cu–Ni side, Calphad 27, 309-318 (2003). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2003.10.001