PbSe: enthalpy of formation

7 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 6, model 1).

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of PbSe reported in the literature (7)
Value	Phase as printed	T (K)	Class	Method	System	Source	Location
-105 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	PbSe	298.15	experimental	Oxygen vessel calorimetry	Pb–Se	[1] Liu 2012 cites ref. 36	Table IX, p. 8, row 2 report
-100.3 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	PbSe	298.15	experimental	EMF measurements	Pb–Se	[1] Liu 2012 cites Shamsuddin 1973	Table IX, p. 8, row 6 report
-99.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	PbSe	298.15	experimental	EMF measurements	Pb–Se	[1] Liu 2012 cites ref. 38	Table IX, p. 8, row 4 report
-99.26 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	PbSe	298.15	experimental	Oxide melt drop solution calorimetry	Pb–Se	[1] Liu 2012 cites Deore 2008 doi	Table IX, p. 8, row 1 report
-96.3 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	PbSe	298.15	experimental	Direct combination drop calorimetry	Pb–Se	[1] Liu 2012 cites ref. 37	Table IX, p. 8, row 3 report
-95.1 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	PbSe	298.15	experimental	EMF measurements	Pb–Se	[1] Liu 2012 cites ref. 39	Table IX, p. 8, row 5 report
-99.78 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	PbSe		model	Calculated	Pb–Se	[1] Liu 2012	Table IX, p. 8, row 7 report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of PbSe
Value	Unit	Reading	Method (class, basis)	Effective
-105	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.5	6.4 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)	6.4
-100.3	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.05	9.2 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold)	9.2
-99.5	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.05	9.2 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold)	9.2
-99.26	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.005	6.4 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)	6.4
-96.3	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.05	6.4 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)	6.4
-95.1	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.05	9.2 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold)	9.2
-99.78	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.005	7.8 (model_calculated, calibrated)	7.8

Sources

Yajun Liu, Zhitao Kang, Guang Sheng, Lijun Zhang, Jiang Wang, Zhaohui Long, Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamic Basis for the Cd-Se and Pb-Se Binary Systems, Journal of Elec Materi 41, 1915-1923 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11664-012-2016-7

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735943
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); G. Kim, S. V. Meschel, P. Nash, W. Chen, Experimental formation enthalpies for intermetallic phases and other inorganic compounds, Scientific Data 4 (2017) 170162, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.162; B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file. Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_dft_benchmark_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735943},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735943},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}