Pd4Yb3: enthalpy of formation

5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 3, DFT 1); experimental median -73 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1); OQMD -81.152 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1799704).

Systems: Pd–Yb

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Pd4Yb3 reported in the literature (5)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-73 kJ/mol-atom ± 3Pd4Yb31029.5experimentalKEML/KEMS*Pd–Yb[1] Kardellass 2020
cites Ciccioli 2016 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 42
report
-92.562 kJ/mol-atomPd4Yb3298.15modelPredictionPd–Yb[1] Kardellass 2020
cites De 2014
Table 3, p. 5, row 41
report
-77.2289 kJ/mol-atomPd4Yb3298.15modelOptimization R-KPd–Yb[1] Kardellass 2020Table 3, p. 5, row 39
report
-71.5898 kJ/mol-atomPd4Yb3298.15modelOptimization KPd–Yb[1] Kardellass 2020Table 3, p. 5, row 40
report
-81.181 kJ/mol-atomPd4Yb3298.15DFTAb-initioPd–Yb[1] Kardellass 2020Table 3, p. 5, row 43
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Pd4Yb3
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-73kJ/mol-atom35.000e-54.2 (kems_vapour, calibrated)4.2
-92.562kJ/mol-atom5.000e-63.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-77.2289kJ/mol-atom5.000e-63.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-71.5898kJ/mol-atom5.000e-63.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-81.181kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Pd4Yb3
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
OQMDoqmd-1799704-81.152-0.841081R-31.20090.0124yes

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Said Kardellass, Colette Servant, Isabelle Drouelle, Fatima Zahra Chrifi-Alaoui, Mohamed Idbenali, Alyen Abahazem et al., Calphad-type assessment of the Pd-Yb binary system supported by first-principles calculations – Part II: Results, Materials Today: Proceedings 24, 140-150 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.196