Pt2Sn3: enthalpy of formation

6 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 2, model 3, DFT 1); experimental median -54.45 kJ/mol-atom (n = 2); Materials Project -48.526 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaabtqk); OQMD -54.42 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-18003).

Systems: Pt–Sn

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Pt2Sn3 reported in the literature (6)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-54.5 kJ/mol-atomPt2Sn3298.15experimentalPt–Sn[1] Cui 2021
cites Zhou 2009 doi
Table 5, p. 10, row 20
report
-54.4 kJ/mol-atomPt2Sn3298.15experimentalPt–Sn[1] Cui 2021
cites Ferro 1973
Table 5, p. 10, row 19
report
-52.2778 kJ/mol-atomPt2Sn3modelPt–Sn[2] Hu 2022Table 9, p. 10, row 3
report
-51.8 kJ/mol-atomPt2Sn3298.15modelPt–Sn[1] Cui 2021Table 5, p. 10, row 18
report
-51.7 kJ/mol-atomPt2Sn3298.15modelPt–Sn[1] Cui 2021Table 5, p. 10, row 17
report
-52.32 kJ/mol-atomPt2Sn3DFTPt–Sn[2] Hu 2022Table 9, p. 10, row 3
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Pt2Sn3
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-54.5kJ/mol-atom0.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-54.4kJ/mol-atom0.053.5 (unknown, calibrated)3.5
-52.2778kJ/mol-atom5.000e-53.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-51.8kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-51.7kJ/mol-atom0.053.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-52.32kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Pt2Sn3
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaabtqk-48.526-0.502935P6_3/mmc00no
OQMDoqmd-18003-54.42-0.564021P63/mmc00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Senlin Cui, Matthew Lynn, Ralph E. Napolitano, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the binary Pt–Sn system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 854, 157064 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157064
  2. Jieqiong Hu, Ming Xie, Yongtai Chen, Jiheng Fang, Qiao Zhang, Thermodynamic reassessment of Au–Pt–Sn system, Mater. Res. Express 9, 016507 (2022). doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ac475f