PuO1.61: enthalpy of formation
4 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 4).
Systems: O–Pu
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -342.912 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.29885 | PuO1,61 | 298.15 | model | O–Pu | [1] Guéneau 2008 cites Markin 1966 | Table 5, p. 12, row 11 report | ||
| -338.889 kJ/mol-atom ± 6.39847 | PuO1,61 | 298.15 | model | O–Pu | [1] Guéneau 2008 cites Chereau 1977 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 12 report | ||
| -335.441 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.83142 | PuO1,61 | 298.15 | model | O–Pu | [1] Guéneau 2008 cites Lemire 2001 | Table 5, p. 12, row 13 report | ||
| -332.261 kJ/mol-atom | PuO1,61 | 298.15 | model | O–Pu | [1] Guéneau 2008 | Table 5, p. 12, row 10 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -342.912 | kJ/mol-atom | 2.299 | 0.1916 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | |||
| -338.889 | kJ/mol-atom | 6.398 | 0.01916 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 6.398 | |||
| -335.441 | kJ/mol-atom | 3.831 | 0.01916 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | |||
| -332.261 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.01916 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 |
Sources
- Christine Guéneau, Christian Chatillon, Bo Sundman, Thermodynamic modelling of the plutonium–oxygen system, Journal of Nuclear Materials 378, 257-272 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.013