Re3B: enthalpy of formation

4 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 3); experimental median -32.22 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1); Materials Project -19.625 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaxet); OQMD -18.988 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-8178).

Systems: B–Re

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Re3B reported in the literature (4)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-32.22 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.5Re3B298.15experimentalChemical reactionB–Re[1] Yang 2010
cites Baehren 1969
Table 2, p. 3, row 19
report
-21 kJ/mol-atomRe3BmodelThis workB–Re[1] Yang 2010Table 2, p. 3, row 20
report
-20 kJ/mol-atomRe3BmodelEstimationB–Re[1] Yang 2010
cites Boer 1989
Table 2, p. 3, row 18
report
-19.2975 kJ/mol-atomRe3BmodelFP calculationB–Re[1] Yang 2010
cites Gou 2009
Table 2, p. 3, row 17
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Re3B
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-32.22kJ/mol-atom2.50.0054.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold)4.1
-21kJ/mol-atom0.53.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-20kJ/mol-atom0.53.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-19.2975kJ/mol-atom5.000e-53.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Re3B
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
Materials Projectmp-aaaaaxet-19.625-0.203396Cmcm00no
OQMDoqmd-8178-18.988-0.196795Cmcm00no

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Ying Yang, Shuanglin Chen, Y. Austin Chang, Thermodynamic modeling of the Re–Si–B system, Intermetallics 18, 51-56 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2009.06.003