SrH2: enthalpy of formation

5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 5).

Systems: H–Sr

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of SrH2 reported in the literature (5)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-197 kJ/mol (basis unstated)αSrH2298.15experimentalEvaluation of H2 equilibrium pressureH–Sr[1] Chen 2012
cites Banus 1957
Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
-189 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 8βSrH2298.15experimentalEvaluation of H2 equilibrium pressureH–Sr[1] Chen 2012
cites Peterson 1980 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
-183 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 3αSrH2298.15experimentalEvaluation of H2 equilibrium pressureH–Sr[1] Chen 2012
cites Peterson 1980 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
-180 kJ/mol (basis unstated)αSrH2298.15experimentalCalorimetric methodH–Sr[1] Chen 2012
cites Ehrlich 1963 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 2
report
-176 kJ/mol (basis unstated)αSrH2298.15experimentalCalorimetric methodH–Sr[1] Chen 2012
cites Guntz 1923
Table 1, p. 2, row 1
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of SrH2
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-197kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.510.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated)10.5
-189kJ/mol (basis unstated)80.510.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated)10.5
-183kJ/mol (basis unstated)30.510.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated)10.5
-180kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.59.6 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)9.6
-176kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.59.6 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)9.6

Sources

  1. Chong Chen, Man Wang, Yong Du, Qiannan Gao, Biao Hu, Shuhong Liu, Thermodynamic modeling of the Sr–X (X=H, Li, Na, Sc) systems, Calphad 38, 17-22 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.03.001