SrH2: enthalpy of formation
5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 5).
Systems: H–Sr
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -197 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | αSrH2 | 298.15 | experimental | Evaluation of H2 equilibrium pressure | H–Sr | [1] Chen 2012 cites Banus 1957 | Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report | |
| -189 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 8 | βSrH2 | 298.15 | experimental | Evaluation of H2 equilibrium pressure | H–Sr | [1] Chen 2012 cites Peterson 1980 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report | |
| -183 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 3 | αSrH2 | 298.15 | experimental | Evaluation of H2 equilibrium pressure | H–Sr | [1] Chen 2012 cites Peterson 1980 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 4 report | |
| -180 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | αSrH2 | 298.15 | experimental | Calorimetric method | H–Sr | [1] Chen 2012 cites Ehrlich 1963 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report | |
| -176 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | αSrH2 | 298.15 | experimental | Calorimetric method | H–Sr | [1] Chen 2012 cites Guntz 1923 | Table 1, p. 2, row 1 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -197 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.5 | 10.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated) | 10.5 | ||||
| -189 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 8 | 0.5 | 10.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated) | 10.5 | |||
| -183 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 3 | 0.5 | 10.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated) | 10.5 | |||
| -180 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.5 | 9.6 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 9.6 | ||||
| -176 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.5 | 9.6 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 9.6 |
Sources
- Chong Chen, Man Wang, Yong Du, Qiannan Gao, Biao Hu, Shuhong Liu, Thermodynamic modeling of the Sr–X (X=H, Li, Na, Sc) systems, Calphad 38, 17-22 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.03.001