Tl5Te3: enthalpy of formation
3 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 3); Materials Project -42.288 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaags); OQMD -26.55 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-2028809).
Systems: Te–Tl
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -27.157 kJ/mol-atom | Te3Tl5 | 298.15 | model | Te–Tl | [1] Gierlotka 2010 | Table IV, p. 5, row 5 report | ||
| -27.06 kJ/mol-atom | Te3Tl5 | 298.15 | model | Te–Tl | [1] Gierlotka 2010 cites Landolt-Bornstein 2009 | Table IV, p. 5, row 7 report | ||
| -19.53 kJ/mol-atom | Te3Tl5 | 298.15 | model | Te–Tl | [1] Gierlotka 2010 cites Landolt-Bornstein 2009 | Table IV, p. 5, row 6 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -27.157 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -27.06 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -19.53 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaaags | -42.288 | -0.438284 | I4/mcm | 1.0494 | 0.0109 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-2028809 | -26.55 | -0.275168 | I4/mcm | 0.2802 | 0.0029 | yes |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic Description of the Te-Tl Binary System Using the Associate Solution Model, Journal of Elec Materi 39, 1319-1325 (2010). doi:10.1007/s11664-010-1248-7