# UO3: enthalpy of formation > Enthalpy of formation of UO3: 13 literature value(s) with sources, pages and quotes and DFT values (Materials Project / OQMD), from ORCHID. HTML: https://data.orchid-project.org/compounds/UO3.html · Markdown: https://data.orchid-project.org/compounds/UO3.md 13 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 9, model 4); experimental median -306.478 kJ/mol-atom (n = 9); Materials Project -348.521 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaaol); OQMD -302.1 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-32532). Systems: [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) ## Literature values Table: Enthalpy of formation of UO3 reported in the literature (13) | Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote | |---:|---|---:|---|---|---|---|---|---| | -317.879 kJ/mol-atom | UO3 | 298.15 | experimental | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002; _cites Mixter 1912_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19120780119) | Table 10, p. 8, row 23; `ORC-BMPPU42IE7` | | | -309.407 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.4707 | UO3 | 298.15 | experimental | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002; _cites Vidavskii 1965_ | Table 10, p. 8, row 28; `ORC-5ZBHGDRWSZ` | | | -307.942 kJ/mol-atom | UO3 | 298.15 | experimental | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002; _cites Burdese 1958_ | Table 10, p. 8, row 30; `ORC-WEJ7JF5DM7` | | | -307.001 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.046 | UO3 | 298.15 | experimental | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002; _cites Cordfunke 1965_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9656100050) | Table 10, p. 8, row 27; `ORC-M3KGYFSANX.22068f` | | | -306.478 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.092 | UO3 | 298.15 | experimental | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002; _cites Rand 1963_ | Table 10, p. 8, row 26; `ORC-3B6ALRURNQ` | | | -306.129 kJ/mol-atom | UO3 | 298.15 | experimental | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002; _cites Biltz 1928_ | Table 10, p. 8, row 24; `ORC-HRR3N5ZPTU` | | | -306.025 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.65 | UO3 | 298.15 | experimental | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002; _cites Johnson 1978_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9614%2878%2990046-0) | Table 10, p. 8, row 32; `ORC-FI4CELD56Y` | | | -305.95 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.5 | UO3 | 298.15 | experimental | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002; _cites Cordfunke 1988_ | Table 10, p. 8, row 33; `ORC-22YU3WTHSU.11f98d` | | | -305.746 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.4644 | UO3 | 298.15 | experimental | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002; _cites Fitzgibbon 1967_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1021/je60032a039) | Table 10, p. 8, row 25; `ORC-5OOJQ5V2RS` | | | -304375 per mol-atom ± 750 | UO3(s) | 298.15 | model | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [2] Guéneau 2002; _cites Grenthe 1992_ | Table 4, p. 9, row 8; `ORC-NBHL4NNFQR.30e385` | | | -305.95 kJ/mol-atom | UO3 (s) | 298.15 | model | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [2] Guéneau 2002 | Table 4, p. 9, row 7; `ORC-VJKQQEBA2V.4dc903` | | | -305.95 kJ/mol-atom | UO3 | 298.15 | model | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [1] Chevalier 2002 | Table 10, p. 8, row 34; `ORC-ZBNU4LYAXN.e66d89` | | | -304.375 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.75 | UO3 (s) | 298.15 | model | | [O–U](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/O-U.html) | [2] Guéneau 2002; _cites Grenthe 1992_ | Table 4, p. 9, row 8; `ORC-NBHL4NNFQR.65f769` | | ### Uncertainty budget Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature [SCHEMA.md](https://data.orchid-project.org/literature/SCHEMA.md), [UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md](https://data.orchid-project.org/literature/UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md)): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged. Table: Uncertainty budget of the literature values of UO3 | Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective | |---:|---|---:|---:|---|---:|---:|---:|---:| | -317.879 | kJ/mol-atom | | 1.250e-5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | | | | 3.5 | | -309.407 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.4707 | 1.250e-5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | | | | 3.5 | | -307.942 | kJ/mol-atom | | 1.250e-5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | | | | 3.5 | | -307.001 | kJ/mol-atom | 1.046 | 1.250e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | | | | 3.5 | | -306.478 | kJ/mol-atom | 2.092 | 1.250e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | | | | 3.5 | | -306.129 | kJ/mol-atom | | 1.250e-5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | | | | 3.5 | | -306.025 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.65 | 0.0125 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | | | | 3.5 | | -305.95 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 0.0125 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | | | | 3.5 | | -305.746 | kJ/mol-atom | 1.464 | 1.250e-5 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | | | | 3.5 | | -304375 | per mol-atom | 750 | 0.5 | unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | | | | 750 | | -305.95 | kJ/mol-atom | | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | | | | 3.9 | | -305.95 | kJ/mol-atom | | 0.0125 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | | | | 3.9 | | -304.375 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.75 | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | | | | 3.9 | ## DFT formation energies Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom. Table: DFT formation energy of UO3 | Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical | |---|---|---:|---:|---|---:|---:|---| | Materials Project | mp-aaaaaaol | -348.521 | -3.61218 | Pm-3m | 0 | 0 | no | | OQMD | oqmd-32532 | -302.1 | -3.13105 | I41/amd | 0 | 0 | no | DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. [doi:10.1063/1.4812323](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323) (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. [doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4) (CC BY 4.0); ## Sources 1. P.-Y. Chevalier, E. Fischer, B. Cheynet, Progress in the thermodynamic modelling of the O–U binary system, Journal of Nuclear Materials 303, 1-28 (2002). [doi:10.1016/s0022-3115(02)00813-9](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3115%2802%2900813-9) 2. C. Guéneau, M. Baichi, D. Labroche, C. Chatillon, B. Sundman, Thermodynamic assessment of the uranium–oxygen system, Journal of Nuclear Materials 304, 161-175 (2002). [doi:10.1016/s0022-3115(02)00878-4](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3115%2802%2900878-4) ## Please cite - R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569 - R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735943 - R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065 Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); G. Kim, S. V. Meschel, P. Nash, W. Chen, Experimental formation enthalpies for intermetallic phases and other inorganic compounds, Scientific Data 4 (2017) 170162, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.162; B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file. Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes. ```bibtex @misc{orchid_literature_2026, author = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon}, title = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}}, version = {2026.10}, publisher = {Zenodo}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569}, note = {Version 1, machine-extracted} } @misc{orchid_dft_benchmark_2026, author = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon}, title = {{ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark}}, version = {2026.10}, publisher = {Zenodo}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23735943}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735943}, note = {Version 1, machine-extracted} } @misc{orchid_data_2026, author = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon}, title = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}}, version = {2026.10}, publisher = {Zenodo}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065}, note = {Version 1, machine-extracted} } ``` --- Derived data CC BY 4.0 ([licence](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)): cite ORCHID ([CITATION.cff](https://data.orchid-project.org/CITATION.cff)) and the original sources. Quotes are short excerpts kept so that each value can be checked; they remain under the publishers' copyright and are not relicensed. Source papers, page images and full text are not redistributed. Field reference: [SCHEMA.md](https://data.orchid-project.org/literature/SCHEMA.md). Machine-readable guide: [llms.txt](https://data.orchid-project.org/llms.txt). Found an error? The report link of a value (Markdown: its id, ORC-..., in the Location column) opens a pre-filled GitHub issue, https://github.com/orchid-calphad/orchid-data/issues/new?template=report-value-error.yml&record_id=\, carrying only the record id, source and value; [how to contribute](https://orchid-project.org/contribute/).