W2B5: enthalpy of formation
5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 2, unspecified 3).
Systems: B–W
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -386.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | W2B5-x | model | B–W | [1] Duschanek 1995 cites Kaufman 1985 | Table 6, p. 7, row 19 report | |||
| -192.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | W2B5-x | model | B–W | [1] Duschanek 1995 | Table 6, p. 7, row 21 report | |||
| -199.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 18.8 | W2B5-x | unspecified | B–W | [1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 78Leo | Table 6, p. 7, row 17 report | |||
| -186.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 17.6 | W2B5-x | unspecified | B–W | [1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 78Leo | Table 6, p. 7, row 18 report | |||
| -122.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 7.7 | W2B5-x | unspecified | B–W | [1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 93Mes | Table 6, p. 7, row 20 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -386.6 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.05 | 27.3 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 27.3 | ||||
| -192.5 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.05 | 27.3 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 27.3 | ||||
| -199.6 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 18.8 | 0.05 | 24.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 24.5 | |||
| -186.6 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 17.6 | 0.05 | 24.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 24.5 | |||
| -122.5 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 7.7 | 0.05 | 24.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 24.5 |
Sources
- H. Duschanek, P. Rogl, Critical assessment and thermodynamic calculation of the binary system boron-tungsten (B-W), JPE 16, 150-161 (1995). doi:10.1007/bf02664852