ZrO2: enthalpy of formation
16 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 6, model 9, unspecified 1); experimental median -366 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1); Materials Project -367.957 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaaefy); OQMD -350.528 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-3278).
Systems: O–Zr
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1100.92 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | monoclinic ZrO2 | 298.15 | experimental | O–Zr | [1] Wang 2004 cites Huber 1964 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 3 report | ||
| -1100.8 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | ZrO2 | 298.15 | experimental | Combustion calorimetry | O–Zr | [2] CHEN 2004 cites Huber 1964 | Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report | |
| -1100.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | ZrO2 | 298.15 | experimental | Combustion calorimetry | O–Zr | [2] CHEN 2004 cites Kornilov 1967 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| -1100.56 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | monoclinic ZrO2 | 298.15 | experimental | O–Zr | [1] Wang 2004 cites Kornilov 1967 | Table 3, p. 6, row 4 report | ||
| -1094.1 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | ZrO2 | 298.15 | experimental | Combustion calorimetry | O–Zr | [2] CHEN 2004 cites Humphrey 1954 | Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report | |
| -366 kJ/mol-atom | ZrO2 | 298.15 | experimental | O–Zr | [3] Arroyave 2002 | Table 2, p. 17, row 2 report | ||
| -1101 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | ZrO2 | 298.15 | model | Assessed | O–Zr | [2] CHEN 2004 cites Liang 2001 | Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| -1100.97 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | monoclinic ZrO2 | 298.15 | model | O–Zr | [1] Wang 2004 cites Liang 2001 | Table 3, p. 6, row 8 report | ||
| -1100.7 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | ZrO2 | 298.15 | model | Assessed | O–Zr | [2] CHEN 2004 | Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| -1100.69 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | monoclinic ZrO2 | 298.15 | model | O–Zr | [1] Wang 2004 cites Chen 2004 | Table 3, p. 6, row 10 report | ||
| -1100.6 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | ZrO2 | 298.15 | model | Assessed | O–Zr | [2] CHEN 2004 cites Ackermann 1975 | Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| -1100.57 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | monoclinic ZrO2 | 298.15 | model | O–Zr | [1] Wang 2004 cites Du 1992 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 7 report | ||
| -1100.31 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | monoclinic ZrO2 | 298.15 | model | O–Zr | [1] Wang 2004 cites Arroyave 2002 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 9 report | ||
| -1097.46 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | ZrO2 | 298.15 | model | Assessed | O–Zr | [2] CHEN 2004 cites Chase 1985 | Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report | |
| -573 kJ/mol-atom | ZrO2 | model | Electronegativities | O–Zr | [3] Arroyave 2002 | Table 2, p. 17, row 1 report | ||
| -1100.57 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | monoclinic ZrO2 | 298.15 | unspecified | O–Zr | [1] Wang 2004 cites Dinsdale 2003 | Table 3, p. 6, row 11 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1100.92 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 10.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 10.5 | ||||
| -1100.8 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.05 | 3 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 3 | ||||
| -1100.6 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.05 | 3 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 3 | ||||
| -1100.56 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 10.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 10.5 | ||||
| -1094.1 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.05 | 3 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold) | 3 | ||||
| -366 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -1101 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.5 | 11.7 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 11.7 | ||||
| -1100.97 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 11.7 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 11.7 | ||||
| -1100.7 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.05 | 11.7 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 11.7 | ||||
| -1100.69 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-5 | 11.7 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 11.7 | ||||
| -1100.6 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0.05 | 11.7 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 11.7 | ||||
| -1100.57 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-5 | 11.7 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 11.7 | ||||
| -1100.31 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-5 | 11.7 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 11.7 | ||||
| -1097.46 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 11.7 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 11.7 | ||||
| -573 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -1100.57 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-5 | 10.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 10.5 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaaefy | -367.957 | -3.81362 | P2_1/c | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-3278 | -350.528 | -3.63298 | P21/c | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- Chong Wang, Matvei Zinkevich, Fritz Aldinger, On the thermodynamic modeling of the Zr–O system, Calphad 28, 281-292 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2004.09.002
- M CHEN, B HALLSTEDT, L GAUCKLER, Thermodynamic modeling of the ZrO2–YO1.5 system, Solid State Ionics 170, 255-274 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2004.02.017
- Raymundo Arroyave, Larry Kaufman, Thomas W. Eagar, Thermodynamic modeling of the ZrO system, Calphad 26, 95-118 (2002). doi:10.1016/s0364-5916(02)00027-5