Al–In phases

5 phases (tier A 4, liquid 1); 3 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Al–In system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the Al–In system (5)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	TDB models
TETRAGONAL_A6 phase:al-in:a6-tetragonal	In · A6 · tI2 · I4/mmm (139)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–429.72 K, x(In) 1–1	3
BCC_A2 phase:al-in:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 3 calculated diagram(s)	3
FCC_A1 phase:al-in:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–937.47 K, x(In) 0–6e-05	3
HCP_A3 phase:al-in:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 3 calculated diagram(s)	3
LIQUID phase:al-in:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 429.55–2500 K, x(In) 0–1	3

TETRAGONAL_A6 (Al–In)

Id: phase:al-in:a6-tetragonal; status assigned
Structure: In · A6 · tI2 · I4/mmm (139); type st:a6-in-ti2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: In 1.0000
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–429.72 K, x(In) 1–1
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:al-in:a6-tetragonal
tdb: tdb:AlIn-06Kim.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6, tdb:AlIn-78Ans.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6, tdb:AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6

TDB models of TETRAGONAL_A6 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AlIn-06Kim.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 ac9197706ad970d0…

41: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
42: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN : !

AlIn-78Ans.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 4a0ac2119df7e4d3…

40: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
41: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN : !

AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 a8f7fcc2200e8d6e…

40: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
41: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/0364-5916(78)90008-1 I. Ansara, J.P. Bros, C. Girard, Calphad, 2, 187-96(1978).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1088/0965-0393/14/7/006 S S Kim, T H Sanders, Thermodynamic assessment of the metastable liquidi in the Al–In, Al–Bi and Al–Pb systems, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 14, 1181-1188 (2006).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1515/ijmr-1991-820711 C.A. Coughanowr, I. Ansara, R. Luoma, M. Hamalainen, and H.L. Lukas, Assessment of the Cu-Mg System, Z. Metallkd., 1991, 82, p 574-581
assessment that models this phase

BCC_A2 (Al–In)

Id: phase:al-in:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 3 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:al-in:bcc-a2
tdb: tdb:AlIn-06Kim.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:AlIn-78Ans.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AlIn-06Kim.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 ac9197706ad970d0…

31: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
32: CONST BCC_A2 : AL IN : VA : !

AlIn-78Ans.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 4a0ac2119df7e4d3…

30: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
31: CONST BCC_A2 : AL IN : VA : !

AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 a8f7fcc2200e8d6e…

30: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
31: CONST BCC_A2 : AL IN : VA : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/0364-5916(78)90008-1 I. Ansara, J.P. Bros, C. Girard, Calphad, 2, 187-96(1978).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1088/0965-0393/14/7/006 S S Kim, T H Sanders, Thermodynamic assessment of the metastable liquidi in the Al–In, Al–Bi and Al–Pb systems, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 14, 1181-1188 (2006).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1515/ijmr-1991-820711 C.A. Coughanowr, I. Ansara, R. Luoma, M. Hamalainen, and H.L. Lukas, Assessment of the Cu-Mg System, Z. Metallkd., 1991, 82, p 574-581
assessment that models this phase

FCC_A1 (Al–In)

Id: phase:al-in:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–937.47 K, x(In) 0–6e-05
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:al-in:fcc-a1
tdb: tdb:AlIn-06Kim.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:AlIn-78Ans.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AlIn-06Kim.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 ac9197706ad970d0…

26: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
27: CONST FCC_A1 : AL IN : VA : !

AlIn-78Ans.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 4a0ac2119df7e4d3…

25: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
26: CONST FCC_A1 : AL IN : VA : !

AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 a8f7fcc2200e8d6e…

25: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
26: CONST FCC_A1 : AL IN : VA : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/0364-5916(78)90008-1 I. Ansara, J.P. Bros, C. Girard, Calphad, 2, 187-96(1978).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1088/0965-0393/14/7/006 S S Kim, T H Sanders, Thermodynamic assessment of the metastable liquidi in the Al–In, Al–Bi and Al–Pb systems, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 14, 1181-1188 (2006).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1515/ijmr-1991-820711 C.A. Coughanowr, I. Ansara, R. Luoma, M. Hamalainen, and H.L. Lukas, Assessment of the Cu-Mg System, Z. Metallkd., 1991, 82, p 574-581
assessment that models this phase

HCP_A3 (Al–In)

Id: phase:al-in:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 3 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:al-in:hcp-a3
tdb: tdb:AlIn-06Kim.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:AlIn-78Ans.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AlIn-06Kim.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 ac9197706ad970d0…

36: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
37: CONST HCP_A3 : AL IN : VA : !

AlIn-78Ans.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 4a0ac2119df7e4d3…

35: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
36: CONST HCP_A3 : AL IN : VA : !

AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 a8f7fcc2200e8d6e…

35: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
36: CONST HCP_A3 : AL IN : VA : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/0364-5916(78)90008-1 I. Ansara, J.P. Bros, C. Girard, Calphad, 2, 187-96(1978).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1088/0965-0393/14/7/006 S S Kim, T H Sanders, Thermodynamic assessment of the metastable liquidi in the Al–In, Al–Bi and Al–Pb systems, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 14, 1181-1188 (2006).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1515/ijmr-1991-820711 C.A. Coughanowr, I. Ansara, R. Luoma, M. Hamalainen, and H.L. Lukas, Assessment of the Cu-Mg System, Z. Metallkd., 1991, 82, p 574-581
assessment that models this phase

LIQUID (Al–In)

Id: phase:al-in:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 429.55–2500 K, x(In) 0–1
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:al-in:liquid
tdb: tdb:AlIn-06Kim.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:AlIn-78Ans.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AlIn-06Kim.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 ac9197706ad970d0…

21: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
22: CONST LIQUID:L : AL IN : !

AlIn-78Ans.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 4a0ac2119df7e4d3…

20: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
21: CONST LIQUID:L : AL IN : !

AlIn-91Cou-LB.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 a8f7fcc2200e8d6e…

20: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
21: CONST LIQUID:L : AL IN : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/0364-5916(78)90008-1 I. Ansara, J.P. Bros, C. Girard, Calphad, 2, 187-96(1978).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1088/0965-0393/14/7/006 S S Kim, T H Sanders, Thermodynamic assessment of the metastable liquidi in the Al–In, Al–Bi and Al–Pb systems, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 14, 1181-1188 (2006).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1515/ijmr-1991-820711 C.A. Coughanowr, I. Ansara, R. Luoma, M. Hamalainen, and H.L. Lukas, Assessment of the Cu-Mg System, Z. Metallkd., 1991, 82, p 574-581
assessment that models this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}