Au–Ga phases

14 phases (tier A 6, tier C 2, liquid 1, needs_review 5); 12 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Au–Ga system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the Au–Ga system (14)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	Literature values	TDB models
ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 phase:au-ga:a11-orthorhombic	alpha-Ga · A11 · oC8 · Cmce (64)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–302.91 K, x(Ga) 1–1	11	3
AU7GA phase:au-ga:au7ga		needs_review	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 620.93–695.65 K, x(Ga) 0.13042–0.13687	6	1
AU7GA2_HT phase:au-ga:au7ga2-ht		needs_review	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 554.55–683.26 K, x(Ga) 0.20158–0.22059	44	3
AU7GA2_LT phase:au-ga:au7ga2-lt		needs_review	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–648.89 K, x(Ga) 0.20689–0.23132	16	3
AU7GA3 phase:au-ga:au7ga3	Pd2As · oC24 · Cmc2_1 (36)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–623.44 K, x(Ga) 0.3–0.3	31	2
AU7GA3_HT phase:au-ga:au7ga3-ht		needs_review	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 546.77–621.46 K, x(Ga) 0.30479–0.31954	10	1
AU7GA3_LT phase:au-ga:au7ga3-lt	Pd2As · oC24 · Cmc2_1 (36)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–558.88 K, x(Ga) 0.30002–0.31782	0	1
AU8GA phase:au-ga:au8ga		needs_review	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 619.39–692.59 K, x(Ga) 0.11686–0.14258	28	2
AUGA_B31 phase:au-ga:auga-b31	MnP · B31 · oP8 · Pnma (62)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–733.98 K, x(Ga) 0.5–0.5	37	3
AUGA2_C1 phase:au-ga:auga2-c1	CaF2 · C1 · cF12 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–764.91 K, x(Ga) 0.66667–0.66667	34	3
BCC_A2 phase:au-ga:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 3 calculated diagram(s)	0	3
FCC_A1 phase:au-ga:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–1350.33 K, x(Ga) 0–0.12333	25	3
HCP_A3 phase:au-ga:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 3 calculated diagram(s)	0	3
LIQUID phase:au-ga:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 302.81–2500 K, x(Ga) 0–1	124	3

ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:a11-orthorhombic; status assigned
Structure: alpha-Ga · A11 · oC8 · Cmce (64); type st:a11-alpha-ga-oc8; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Ga 1.0000
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–302.91 K, x(Ga) 1–1
Literature: 11 values (9 accepted) from 3 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (8): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:a11-orthorhombic, corpus:phase:au-ga:orthorhombic-a11
paper: paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:(Ga), paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009:(Ga), paper:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044:orth. (Ga)
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:ORTHORHOMBIC_A11, tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:ORTHORHOMBIC_A11, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:ORTHORHOMBIC_A11

TDB models of ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: ORTHORHOMBIC_A11, type code %, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

52: PHASE ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 % 1 1 !
53: CONST ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 : GA : !

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: ORTHORHOMBIC_A11, type code %, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

45: PHASE ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 % 1 1 !
46: CONST ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 : GA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: ORTHORHOMBIC_A11, type code %, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

46: PHASE ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 % 1 1 !
47: CONST ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 : GA : !

Example references (4 of 4; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AU7GA (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:au7ga; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: no_structure_token; off_stoichiometric_model; sgte_mmc2_rows_disagree
Candidate (literature_printed): alpha-La · hP4 — printed with a label mapped to this phase
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): alpha-La · A3' · hP4 · P6_3/mmc (194) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for AU7GA: Au8Ga (D0_24 (Ni3Ti) in Massalski)
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): Ni3Ti · D0_24 · hP16 · P6_3/mmc (194) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for AU7GA: Au8Ga (DHCP (alpha-La) according to Pauling file)
Candidate (tdb_comment): — AuGa-10Liu.tdb: 'Prototype Ni3Ti (SB D0_24, hP16, P6_3/mmc); according to JPE/Predel'
Candidate (tdb_comment): — AuGa-10Liu.tdb: 'Prototype alpha-La (SB A3', hP4, P6_3/mmc); according to Pauling file'
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 620.93–695.65 K, x(Ga) 0.13042–0.13687
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:au7ga
paper: paper:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044:αAu7Ga
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:AU7GA

TDB models of AU7GA (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: AU7GA, type code %, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

58: PHASE AU7GA % 2 7 1 !
59: CONST AU7GA : AU% GA : GA : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0925-8388(95)01606-6 D. Mouani, G. Morgant, B. Legendre, Study of the phase equilibria in the ternary goldgalliumtellurium system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 226, 222-231 (1995).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AU7GA2_HT (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:au7ga2-ht; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: assessment_declared_compound_differs_from_model_composition; no_structure_token; off_stoichiometric_model
Candidate (literature_printed): Au7Ga2 · hP27 — printed with a label mapped to this phase
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): Au7Ga2 · hP27 · P-62m (189) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for AU7GA2_HT: Au7Ga2 (high T)
Candidate (tdb_comment): Au7Ga2 · hP27 · P-62m — AuGa-10Liu.tdb: 'Prototype Au7Ga2 (hP27, P-62m); beta'
Candidate (tdb_comment): Au7Ga2 · hP27 · P-62m — AuGa-11Wan.tdb: 'Prototype Au7Ga2 (hP27, P-62m); beta'
Candidate (tdb_comment): Au7Ga2 · hP27 · P-62m — AuGa-17Jen.tdb: 'Prototype Au7Ga2 (hP27, P-62m); beta'
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 554.55–683.26 K, x(Ga) 0.20158–0.22059
Literature: 44 values (39 accepted) from 3 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (9): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:au7ga2-ht
paper: paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:β-Au7Ga2, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009:β-Au7Ga2, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009:β′-Au7Ga2, paper:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044:β'Au7Ga2, paper:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044:βAu7Ga2
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:AU7GA2_HT, tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:AU7GA2_HT, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:AU7GA2_HT

TDB models of AU7GA2_HT (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: AU7GA2_HT, type code %, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

63: PHASE AU7GA2_HT % 2 7 2 !
64: CONST AU7GA2_HT : AU : AU GA% : !

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: AU7GA2_HT, type code %, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

56: PHASE AU7GA2_HT % 2 0.7895 0.2105 !
57: CONST AU7GA2_HT : AU : GA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: AU7GA2_HT, type code %, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

57: PHASE AU7GA2_HT % 2 0.7895 0.2105 !
58: CONST AU7GA2_HT : AU : GA : !

Example references (5 of 5; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0925-8388(95)01606-6 D. Mouani, G. Morgant, B. Legendre, Study of the phase equilibria in the ternary goldgalliumtellurium system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 226, 222-231 (1995).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AU7GA2_LT (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:au7ga2-lt; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: no_structure_token; off_stoichiometric_model; sgte_mmc2_row_incomplete
Candidate (literature_printed): (Au7Ga2) · o** — printed with a label mapped to this phase
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): (Au7Ga2) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for AU7GA2_LT: Au7Ga2
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–648.89 K, x(Ga) 0.20689–0.23132
Literature: 16 values (10 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (6): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:au7ga2-lt
paper: paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:β'-Au7Ga2, paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:β′-Au7Ga2
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:AU7GA2_LT, tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:AU7GA2_LT, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:AU7GA2_LT

TDB models of AU7GA2_LT (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: AU7GA2_LT, type code %, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

68: PHASE AU7GA2_LT % 2 7 2 !
69: CONST AU7GA2_LT : AU% GA : AU GA% : !

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: AU7GA2_LT, type code %, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

61: PHASE AU7GA2_LT % 2 7 2 !
62: CONST AU7GA2_LT : AU : GA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: AU7GA2_LT, type code %, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

62: PHASE AU7GA2_LT % 2 7 2 !
63: CONST AU7GA2_LT : AU : GA : !

Example references (4 of 4; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AU7GA3 (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:au7ga3; status assigned
Structure: Pd2As · oC24 · Cmc2_1 (36); type st:pd2as-oc24; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_both, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Au 0.7000, Ga 0.3000
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–623.44 K, x(Ga) 0.3–0.3
Literature: 31 values (23 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:au7ga3
paper: paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:γ-Au7Ga3, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009:γ-Au7Ga3
tdb: tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:AU7GA3, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:AU7GA3

TDB models of AU7GA3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: AU7GA3, type code %, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

66: PHASE AU7GA3 % 2 7 3 !
67: CONST AU7GA3 : AU : GA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: AU7GA3, type code %, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

67: PHASE AU7GA3 % 2 7 3 !
68: CONST AU7GA3 : AU : GA : !

Example references (4 of 4; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AU7GA3_HT (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:au7ga3-ht; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: no_structure_token; off_stoichiometric_model; sgte_mmc2_row_incomplete
Candidate (literature_printed): (Au7Ga3) · o** — printed with a label mapped to this phase
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): (Au7Ga3) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for AU7GA3_HT: Au7Ga3 (high T)
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 546.77–621.46 K, x(Ga) 0.30479–0.31954
Literature: 10 values (10 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:au7ga3-ht
paper: paper:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044:γAu7Ga3
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:AU7GA3_HT

TDB models of AU7GA3_HT (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: AU7GA3_HT, type code %, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

78: PHASE AU7GA3_HT % 2 7 3 !
79: CONST AU7GA3_HT : AU% GA : AU GA% : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AU7GA3_LT (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:au7ga3-lt; status assigned
Structure: Pd2As · oC24 · Cmc2_1 (36); type st:pd2as-oc24; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_structure_token, off_stoichiometric_model); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–558.88 K, x(Ga) 0.30002–0.31782
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:au7ga3-lt
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:AU7GA3_LT

TDB models of AU7GA3_LT (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: AU7GA3_LT, type code %, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

73: PHASE AU7GA3_LT % 2 7 3 !
74: CONST AU7GA3_LT : AU% GA : AU GA% : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase

AU8GA (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:au8ga; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: no_structure_token; off_stoichiometric_model; sgte_mmc2_rows_disagree
Candidate (literature_printed): alpha-La · hP4 — printed with a label mapped to this phase
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): alpha-La · A3' · hP4 · P6_3/mmc (194) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for AU8GA: Au8Ga (D0_24 (Ni3Ti) in paper and Massalski)
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): Ni3Ti · D0_24 · hP16 · P6_3/mmc (194) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for AU8GA: Au8Ga (DHCP (alpha-La) according to Pauling file)
Candidate (tdb_comment): — AuGa-11Wan.tdb: 'Prototype Ni3Ti (SB D0_24, hP16, P6_3/mmc); according to JPE/Predel'
Candidate (tdb_comment): — AuGa-11Wan.tdb: 'Prototype alpha-La (SB A3', hP4, P6_3/mmc); according to Pauling file'
Candidate (tdb_comment): — AuGa-17Jen.tdb: 'Prototype Ni3Ti (SB D0_24, hP16, P6_3/mmc); according to JPE/Predel'
Candidate (tdb_comment): — AuGa-17Jen.tdb: 'Prototype alpha-La (SB A3', hP4, P6_3/mmc); according to Pauling file'
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 619.39–692.59 K, x(Ga) 0.11686–0.14258
Literature: 28 values (23 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:au8ga
paper: paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:D024, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009:D024
tdb: tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:AU8GA, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:AU8GA

TDB models of AU8GA (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: AU8GA, type code %, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

51: PHASE AU8GA % 1 1 !
52: CONST AU8GA : AU GA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: AU8GA, type code %, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

52: PHASE AU8GA % 1 1 !
53: CONST AU8GA : AU GA : !

Example references (5 of 5; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0925-8388(95)01606-6 D. Mouani, G. Morgant, B. Legendre, Study of the phase equilibria in the ternary goldgalliumtellurium system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 226, 222-231 (1995).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AUGA_B31 (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:auga-b31; status assigned
Structure: MnP · B31 · oP8 · Pnma (62); type st:b31-mnp-op8; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Caveat: DFT agrees: on-hull mp-aaaabsyl and oqmd-10725, space group 62
Stoichiometry: Au 0.5000, Ga 0.5000
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–733.98 K, x(Ga) 0.5–0.5
Literature: 37 values (30 accepted) from 3 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (9): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:auga-b31
mp: mp:mp-aaaabsyl
oqmd: oqmd:oqmd-10725
paper: paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:AuGa, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009:AuGa, paper:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044:AuGa
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:AUGA_B31, tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:AUGA_B31, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:AUGA_B31

TDB models of AUGA_B31 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: AUGA_B31, type code %, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

83: PHASE AUGA_B31 % 2 1 1 !
84: CONST AUGA_B31 : AU : GA : !

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: AUGA_B31, type code %, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

71: PHASE AUGA_B31 % 2 1 1 !
72: CONST AUGA_B31 : AU : GA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: AUGA_B31, type code %, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

72: PHASE AUGA_B31 % 2 1 1 !
73: CONST AUGA_B31 : AU : GA : !

Example references (4 of 4; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AUGA2_C1 (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:auga2-c1; status assigned
Structure: CaF2 · C1 · cF12 · Fm-3m (225); type st:c1-caf2-cf12; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Caveat: DFT agrees: on-hull mp-aaaaaecu and oqmd-10726, space group 225
Stoichiometry: Au 0.3333, Ga 0.6667
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–764.91 K, x(Ga) 0.66667–0.66667
Literature: 34 values (27 accepted) from 3 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (9): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:auga2-c1
mp: mp:mp-aaaaaecu
oqmd: oqmd:oqmd-10726
paper: paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:AuGa2, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009:AuGa2, paper:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044:AuGa2
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:AUGA2_C1, tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:AUGA2_C1, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:AUGA2_C1

TDB models of AUGA2_C1 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: AUGA2_C1, type code %, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

88: PHASE AUGA2_C1 % 2 1 2 !
89: CONST AUGA2_C1 : AU : GA : !

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: AUGA2_C1, type code %, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

76: PHASE AUGA2_C1 % 2 1 2 !
77: CONST AUGA2_C1 : AU : GA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: AUGA2_C1, type code %, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

77: PHASE AUGA2_C1 % 2 1 2 !
78: CONST AUGA2_C1 : AU : GA : !

Example references (4 of 4; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase

BCC_A2 (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 3 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:bcc-a2
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

42: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
43: CONST BCC_A2 : AU GA : VA : !

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

35: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
36: CONST BCC_A2 : AU GA : VA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

36: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
37: CONST BCC_A2 : AU GA : VA : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase

FCC_A1 (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 300–1350.33 K, x(Ga) 0–0.12333
Literature: 25 values (22 accepted) from 3 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (7): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:fcc-a1
paper: paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:fcc(Au), paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009:fcc(Au), paper:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044:fcc(Au)
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

37: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
38: CONST FCC_A1 : AU% GA : VA : !

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

30: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
31: CONST FCC_A1 : AU% GA : VA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

31: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
32: CONST FCC_A1 : AU% GA : VA : !

Example references (5 of 5; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0925-8388(95)01606-6 D. Mouani, G. Morgant, B. Legendre, Study of the phase equilibria in the ternary goldgalliumtellurium system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 226, 222-231 (1995).
cited as the source of values for this phase

HCP_A3 (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 3 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:hcp-a3
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

47: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
48: CONST HCP_A3 : AU GA : VA : !

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

40: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
41: CONST HCP_A3 : AU GA : VA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

41: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
42: CONST HCP_A3 : AU GA : VA : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase

LIQUID (Au–Ga)

Id: phase:au-ga:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 3 of 3 calculated diagram(s): 302.81–2500 K, x(Ga) 0–1
Literature: 124 values (99 accepted) from 3 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (7): corpus: corpus:phase:au-ga:liquid
paper: paper:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x:L, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009:L, paper:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044:liq.
tdb: tdb:AuGa-10Liu.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:AuGa-11Wan.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:AuGa-17Jen.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (3): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AuGa-10Liu.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 51eea597b194a708…

32: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
33: CONST LIQUID:L : AU GA : !

AuGa-11Wan.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 c221358471cb158d…

25: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
26: CONST LIQUID:L : AU GA : !

AuGa-17Jen.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 f48e0a641b8f1573…

26: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
27: CONST LIQUID:L : AU GA : !

Example references (5 of 5; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0543-x Dominika Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, Thermodynamic Study and Re-optimization of the Au-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 305-318 (2017).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2010.10.009 J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga binary system, Calphad 35, 242-248 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.044 Jinming Liu, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508, 62-70 (2010).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 C.J. Cooke, W. Hume-Rothery, The equilibrium diagram of the system gold-gallium, Journal of the Less Common Metals 10, 42-51 (1966).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0925-8388(95)01606-6 D. Mouani, G. Morgant, B. Legendre, Study of the phase equilibria in the ternary goldgalliumtellurium system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 226, 222-231 (1995).
cited as the source of values for this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}