B–Pr phases

10 phases (tier A 6, tier C 1, liquid 1, needs_review 2); 8 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · B–Pr system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the B–Pr system (10)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	Literature values	TDB models
ALPHA_RHOMBO_B phase:b-pr:b-alpha-rhombo		needs_review	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1388 K, x(B) 1–1	0	2
BETA_RHOMBO_B phase:b-pr:b-beta-rhombo		needs_review	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1388–2349 K, x(B) 1–1	6	2
BCC_A2 phase:b-pr:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1067.99–3999.03 K, x(B) 0–0	14	2
DHCP phase:b-pr:dhcp-a3	alpha-La · A3' · hP4 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1203 K, x(B) 0–0	3	2
FCC_A1 phase:b-pr:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)	0	2
HCP_A3 phase:b-pr:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)	0	2
LIQUID phase:b-pr:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1182.65–4000 K, x(B) 0–1	36	2
PR2B5 phase:b-pr:pr2b5	Pr2B5 · mC56 · C2/c (15)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2343.25 K, x(B) 0.71429–0.71429	13	2
PRB4_D1E phase:b-pr:prb4-d1e	UB4 · D1_e · tP20 · P4/mbm (127)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2623.17 K, x(B) 0.8–0.8	10	2
PRB6_D21 phase:b-pr:prb6-d21	CaB6 · D2_1 · cP7 · Pm-3m (221)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2883.17 K, x(B) 0.85714–0.91464	18	2

ALPHA_RHOMBO_B (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:b-alpha-rhombo; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: name_has_descriptive_tokens:RHOMBO; no_structure_token
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): alpha-B · hR12 · R-3m (166) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for ALPHA_RHOMBO_B: Si_nB
Candidate (tdb_comment): alpha-B · hR12 · R-3m — PrB-13Wan.tdb: 'Prototype alpha-B (hR12, R-3m)'
Candidate (tdb_comment): alpha-B · hR12 · R-3m — PrB-20Che.tdb: 'Prototype alpha-B (hR12, R-3m)'
Stoichiometry: B 1.0000
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1388 K, x(B) 1–1
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:b-alpha-rhombo
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:ALPHA_RHOMBO_B, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:ALPHA_RHOMBO_B

TDB models of ALPHA_RHOMBO_B (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: ALPHA_RHOMBO_B, type code %, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

46: PHASE ALPHA_RHOMBO_B % 1 1 !
47: CONST ALPHA_RHOMBO_B : B : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: ALPHA_RHOMBO_B, type code %, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

50: PHASE ALPHA_RHOMBO_B % 1 1 !
51: CONST ALPHA_RHOMBO_B : B : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase

BETA_RHOMBO_B (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:b-beta-rhombo; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: name_has_descriptive_tokens:RHOMBO; no_structure_token
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): beta-B · hR105 · R-3m (166) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for BETA_RHOMBO_B: beta-B
Candidate (tdb_comment): beta-B · hR105 · R-3m — PrB-13Wan.tdb: 'Prototype beta-B (hR105, R-3m)'
Candidate (tdb_comment): beta-B · hR105 · R-3m — PrB-20Che.tdb: 'Prototype beta-B (hR105, R-3m)'
Stoichiometry: B 1.0000
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1388–2349 K, x(B) 1–1
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:b-beta-rhombo
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001:(βB)
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:BETA_RHOMBO_B, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:BETA_RHOMBO_B

TDB models of BETA_RHOMBO_B (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: BETA_RHOMBO_B, type code %, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

51: PHASE BETA_RHOMBO_B % 1 1 !
52: CONST BETA_RHOMBO_B : B : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: BETA_RHOMBO_B, type code %, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

55: PHASE BETA_RHOMBO_B % 1 1 !
56: CONST BETA_RHOMBO_B : B : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase

BCC_A2 (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1067.99–3999.03 K, x(B) 0–0
Literature: 14 values (14 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:bcc-a2
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001:(βPr), paper:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983:bcc(Pr)
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

31: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
32: CONST BCC_A2 : B PR% : VA : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

35: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
36: CONST BCC_A2 : B PR% : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase

DHCP (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:dhcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: alpha-La · A3' · hP4 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-alpha-la-hp4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Pr 1.0000
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1203 K, x(B) 0–0
Literature: 3 values (3 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:dhcp-a3
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001:(αPr)
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:DHCP, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:DHCP

TDB models of DHCP (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: DHCP, type code %, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

41: PHASE DHCP % 1 1 !
42: CONST DHCP : PR : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: DHCP, type code %, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

45: PHASE DHCP % 1 1 !
46: CONST DHCP : PR : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase

FCC_A1 (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: B 1.0000
Stability: not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:fcc-a1
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

26: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
27: CONST FCC_A1 : B : VA : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

30: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
31: CONST FCC_A1 : B : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase

HCP_A3 (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: B 1.0000
Stability: not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:hcp-a3
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

36: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
37: CONST HCP_A3 : B : VA : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

40: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
41: CONST HCP_A3 : B : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase

LIQUID (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1182.65–4000 K, x(B) 0–1
Literature: 36 values (36 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:liquid
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001:L, paper:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983:liq.
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

21: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
22: CONST LIQUID:L : B PR : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

25: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
26: CONST LIQUID:L : B PR : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase

PR2B5 (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:pr2b5; status assigned
Structure: Pr2B5 · mC56 · C2/c (15); type st:pr2b5-mc56; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (dft_space_group_15_matches_3_structure_types, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: B 0.7143, Pr 0.2857
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2343.25 K, x(B) 0.71429–0.71429
Literature: 13 values (13 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:pr2b5
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001:B5Pr2, paper:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983:Pr2B5
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:PR2B5, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:PR2B5

TDB models of PR2B5 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: PR2B5, type code %, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

56: PHASE PR2B5 % 2 2 5 !
57: CONST PR2B5 : PR : B : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: PR2B5, type code %, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

60: PHASE PR2B5 % 2 2 5 !
61: CONST PR2B5 : PR : B : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase

PRB4_D1E (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:prb4-d1e; status assigned
Structure: UB4 · D1_e · tP20 · P4/mbm (127); type st:d1-e-ub4-tp20; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Caveat: DFT agrees: on-hull mp-aaaaaspl and oqmd-18748, space group 127
Stoichiometry: B 0.8000, Pr 0.2000
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2623.17 K, x(B) 0.8–0.8
Literature: 10 values (10 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (7): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:prb4-d1e
mp: mp:mp-aaaaaspl
oqmd: oqmd:oqmd-18748
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001:B4Pr, paper:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983:PrB4
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:PRB4_D1E, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:PRB4_D1E

TDB models of PRB4_D1E (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: PRB4_D1E, type code %, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

61: PHASE PRB4_D1E % 2 1 4 !
62: CONST PRB4_D1E : PR : B : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: PRB4_D1E, type code %, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

65: PHASE PRB4_D1E % 2 1 4 !
66: CONST PRB4_D1E : PR : B : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase

PRB6_D21 (B–Pr)

Id: phase:b-pr:prb6-d21; status assigned
Structure: CaB6 · D2_1 · cP7 · Pm-3m (221); type st:d2-1-cab6-cp7; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2883.17 K, x(B) 0.85714–0.91464
Literature: 18 values (18 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:b-pr:prb6-d21
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001:B6Pr, paper:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983:PrB6
tdb: tdb:PrB-13Wan.tdb:PRB6_D21, tdb:PrB-20Che.tdb:PRB6_D21

TDB models of PRB6_D21 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

PrB-13Wan.tdb: PRB6_D21, type code %, sha256 a95dbd566cd88a91…

66: PHASE PRB6_D21 % 2 1 6 !
67: CONST PRB6_D21 : PR% B : B : !

PrB-20Che.tdb: PRB6_D21, type code %, sha256 1085e8b115f28b9a…

70: PHASE PRB6_D21 % 2 1 6 !
71: CONST PRB6_D21 : PR% B : B : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001 C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165983 Taili Chen, Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic description of the Pr–Fe–B system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165983 (2020).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}