Bi–Dy phases

7 phases (tier A 5, tier C 1, liquid 1); 6 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Bi–Dy system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the Bi–Dy system (7)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	Literature values	TDB models
RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 phase:bi-dy:a7-rhombohedral	alpha-As · A7 · hR2 · R-3m (166)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–544.55 K, x(Dy) 0–0	2	1
BCC_A2 phase:bi-dy:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 1654.15–2499.15 K, x(Dy) 1–1	0	1
BI3DY5 phase:bi-dy:bi3dy5	Bi3Y5 · oP32 · Pnma (62)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1719.23 K, x(Dy) 0.625–0.625	10	1
BIDY_B1 phase:bi-dy:bidy-b1	NaCl · B1 · cF8 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2023.03 K, x(Dy) 0.5–0.5	6	1
FCC_A1 phase:bi-dy:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)	0	1
HCP_A3 phase:bi-dy:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2499.77 K, x(Dy) 1–1	2	1
LIQUID phase:bi-dy:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 543.54–2500 K, x(Dy) 0–1	8	1

RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (Bi–Dy)

Id: phase:bi-dy:a7-rhombohedral; status assigned
Structure: alpha-As · A7 · hR2 · R-3m (166); type st:a7-alpha-as-hr2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Bi 1.0000
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–544.55 K, x(Dy) 0–0
Literature: 2 values (2 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:bi-dy:a7-rhombohedral, corpus:phase:bi-dy:rhombohedral-a7
paper: paper:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024:Rhomb_A7 (Bi)
tdb: tdb:BiDy-13Wan.tdb:RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7

TDB models of RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

BiDy-13Wan.tdb: RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7, type code %, sha256 24b216373fd672e5…

41: PHASE RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 % 1 1 !
42: CONST RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 : BI : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024 Jinsan Wang, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, Bo Wu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Bi–Er and the Bi–Dy systems, Thermochimica Acta 566, 44-49 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase

BCC_A2 (Bi–Dy)

Id: phase:bi-dy:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 1654.15–2499.15 K, x(Dy) 1–1
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:bi-dy:bcc-a2
tdb: tdb:BiDy-13Wan.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

BiDy-13Wan.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 24b216373fd672e5…

31: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
32: CONST BCC_A2 : BI DY% : VA : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024 Jinsan Wang, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, Bo Wu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Bi–Er and the Bi–Dy systems, Thermochimica Acta 566, 44-49 (2013).
assessment that models this phase

BI3DY5 (Bi–Dy)

Id: phase:bi-dy:bi3dy5; status assigned
Structure: Bi3Y5 · oP32 · Pnma (62); type st:bi3y5-op32; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (mp_oqmd_space_groups_differ, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Bi 0.3750, Dy 0.6250
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1719.23 K, x(Dy) 0.625–0.625
Literature: 10 values (10 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:bi-dy:bi3dy5
paper: paper:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024:Bi3Dy5
tdb: tdb:BiDy-13Wan.tdb:BI3DY5

TDB models of BI3DY5 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

BiDy-13Wan.tdb: BI3DY5, type code %, sha256 24b216373fd672e5…

51: PHASE BI3DY5 % 2 3 5 !
52: CONST BI3DY5 : BI : DY : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024 Jinsan Wang, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, Bo Wu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Bi–Er and the Bi–Dy systems, Thermochimica Acta 566, 44-49 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/s0925-8388(01)01009-x M Drzyzga, J Szade, Structure and magnetism of R5Bi3 (R=Tb, Dy, Ho, Er) and Tb4Bi3, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 321, 27-34 (2001).
cited as the source of values for this phase

BIDY_B1 (Bi–Dy)

Id: phase:bi-dy:bidy-b1; status assigned
Structure: NaCl · B1 · cF8 · Fm-3m (225); type st:b1-nacl-cf8; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Bi 0.5000, Dy 0.5000
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2023.03 K, x(Dy) 0.5–0.5
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:bi-dy:bidy-b1
paper: paper:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024:BiDy
tdb: tdb:BiDy-13Wan.tdb:BIDY_B1

TDB models of BIDY_B1 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

BiDy-13Wan.tdb: BIDY_B1, type code %, sha256 24b216373fd672e5…

46: PHASE BIDY_B1 % 2 1 1 !
47: CONST BIDY_B1 : BI : DY : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024 Jinsan Wang, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, Bo Wu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Bi–Er and the Bi–Dy systems, Thermochimica Acta 566, 44-49 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase

FCC_A1 (Bi–Dy)

Id: phase:bi-dy:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:bi-dy:fcc-a1
tdb: tdb:BiDy-13Wan.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

BiDy-13Wan.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 24b216373fd672e5…

26: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
27: CONST FCC_A1 : BI DY : VA : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024 Jinsan Wang, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, Bo Wu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Bi–Er and the Bi–Dy systems, Thermochimica Acta 566, 44-49 (2013).
assessment that models this phase

HCP_A3 (Bi–Dy)

Id: phase:bi-dy:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2499.77 K, x(Dy) 1–1
Literature: 2 values (2 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:bi-dy:hcp-a3
paper: paper:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024:Hcp_A3 (Dy)
tdb: tdb:BiDy-13Wan.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

BiDy-13Wan.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 24b216373fd672e5…

36: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
37: CONST HCP_A3 : BI DY% : VA: !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024 Jinsan Wang, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, Bo Wu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Bi–Er and the Bi–Dy systems, Thermochimica Acta 566, 44-49 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase

LIQUID (Bi–Dy)

Id: phase:bi-dy:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 543.54–2500 K, x(Dy) 0–1
Literature: 8 values (8 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:bi-dy:liquid
paper: paper:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024:L
tdb: tdb:BiDy-13Wan.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

BiDy-13Wan.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 24b216373fd672e5…

21: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
22: CONST LIQUID:L : BI DY : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.024 Jinsan Wang, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, Bo Wu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Bi–Er and the Bi–Dy systems, Thermochimica Acta 566, 44-49 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}