Cd–Mg phases

5 phases (tier A 3, liquid 1, needs_review 1); 3 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Cd–Mg system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the Cd–Mg system (5)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	Literature values	TDB models
BCC_A2 phase:cd-mg:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)	0	1
FCC_A1 phase:cd-mg:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)	0	1
HCP_4SL phase:cd-mg:hcp-4sl		needs_review	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–920 K, x(Mg) 0.01–1	13	1
HCP_A3 phase:cd-mg:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–923 K, x(Mg) 0–1	6	2
LIQUID phase:cd-mg:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 594.22–2500 K, x(Mg) 0–1	0	1

BCC_A2 (Cd–Mg)

Id: phase:cd-mg:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:cd-mg:bcc-a2
tdb: tdb:CdMg-12Ren.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CdMg-12Ren.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 2a1ea62b541b4fa1…

33: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
34: CONST BCC_A2 : CD MG : VA : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016 Xin Ren, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, A thermodynamic assessment of the Cd–Mg system, Thermochimica Acta 534, 1-8 (2012).
assessment that models this phase

FCC_A1 (Cd–Mg)

Id: phase:cd-mg:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:cd-mg:fcc-a1
tdb: tdb:CdMg-12Ren.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CdMg-12Ren.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 2a1ea62b541b4fa1…

28: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
29: CONST FCC_A1 : CD MG : VA : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016 Xin Ren, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, A thermodynamic assessment of the Cd–Mg system, Thermochimica Acta 534, 1-8 (2012).
assessment that models this phase

HCP_4SL (Cd–Mg)

Id: phase:cd-mg:hcp-4sl; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: order_disorder_ambiguity:CdMg-12Ren.tdb_model_is_partitioned; sgte_mmc2_row_disagrees_with_name:HCP_4SL; sgte_mmc2_rows_disagree; unrecognised_name_tokens:4SL
Candidate (dft_mp): P-6m2 (187) — on-hull MP Mg149Cd at x(MG)=0.9933
Candidate (dft_mp): Cmcm (63) — on-hull MP Mg2Cd at x(MG)=0.6667
Candidate (dft_mp): P6_3/mmc (194) — on-hull MP Mg3Cd at x(MG)=0.7500
Candidate (dft_mp): Amm2 (38) — on-hull MP MgCd at x(MG)=0.5000
Candidate (dft_mp): Cmcm (63) — on-hull MP MgCd2 at x(MG)=0.3333
Candidate (dft_mp): P6_3/mmc (194) — on-hull MP MgCd3 at x(MG)=0.2500
Candidate (dft_oqmd): Pmma (51) — on-hull OQMD Cd1 Mg1 at x(MG)=0.5000
Candidate (dft_oqmd): Cmcm (63) — on-hull OQMD Cd1 Mg3 at x(MG)=0.7500
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–920 K, x(Mg) 0.01–1
Literature: 13 values (13 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (6): corpus: corpus:phase:cd-mg:hcp-4sl
paper: paper:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016:AB3, paper:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016:Cd3Mg, paper:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016:CdMg, paper:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016:CdMg3
tdb: tdb:CdMg-12Ren.tdb:HCP_4SL

TDB models of HCP_4SL (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CdMg-12Ren.tdb: HCP_4SL, type code %AZ, sha256 2a1ea62b541b4fa1…

48: PHASE HCP_4SL %AZ 5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.5 !
49: CONST HCP_4SL : CD MG : CD MG : CD MG : CD MG : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016 Xin Ren, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, A thermodynamic assessment of the Cd–Mg system, Thermochimica Acta 534, 1-8 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02868720 Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Wypartowicz, L. Zabdyr, The Cd–Mg (Cadmium–Magnesium) system, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 5 (1984) 23–30.
cited as the source of values for this phase

HCP_A3 (Cd–Mg)

Id: phase:cd-mg:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–923 K, x(Mg) 0–1
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:cd-mg:hcp-a3
paper: paper:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016:Hcp_A3
tdb: tdb:CdMg-12Ren.tdb:A3_HCP, tdb:CdMg-12Ren.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CdMg-12Ren.tdb: A3_HCP, type code %A, sha256 2a1ea62b541b4fa1…

43: PHASE A3_HCP %A 2 1 0.5 !
44: CONST A3_HCP : CD MG : VA : !

CdMg-12Ren.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 2a1ea62b541b4fa1…

38: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
39: CONST HCP_A3 : CD MG : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016 Xin Ren, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, A thermodynamic assessment of the Cd–Mg system, Thermochimica Acta 534, 1-8 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02868720 Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Wypartowicz, L. Zabdyr, The Cd–Mg (Cadmium–Magnesium) system, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 5 (1984) 23–30.
cited as the source of values for this phase

LIQUID (Cd–Mg)

Id: phase:cd-mg:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 594.22–2500 K, x(Mg) 0–1
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:cd-mg:liquid
tdb: tdb:CdMg-12Ren.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CdMg-12Ren.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 2a1ea62b541b4fa1…

23: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
24: CONST LIQUID:L : CD MG : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.01.016 Xin Ren, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, A thermodynamic assessment of the Cd–Mg system, Thermochimica Acta 534, 1-8 (2012).
assessment that models this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}