Ce–Pt phases

13 phases (tier A 7, tier C 4, liquid 1, needs_review 1); 12 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Ce–Pt system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the Ce–Pt system (13)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	Literature values	TDB models
BCC_A2 phase:ce-pt:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 987.06–1072 K, x(Pt) 0–0.01128	2	1
CE18PT82 phase:ce-pt:ce18pt82		needs_review	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1999.87 K, x(Pt) 0.82–0.82	0	1
CE3PT2 phase:ce-pt:ce3pt2	Er3Ni2 · hR15 · R-3 (148)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1285.72 K, x(Pt) 0.4–0.4	5	1
CE3PT4 phase:ce-pt:ce3pt4	Pd4Pu3 · hR14 · R-3 (148)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1632.5 K, x(Pt) 0.57143–0.57143	4	1
CE5PT3 phase:ce-pt:ce5pt3	Pu5Rh3 · tP32 · P4/ncc (130)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1209.16 K, x(Pt) 0.37378–0.38497	4	1
CE5PT4 phase:ce-pt:ce5pt4	Ge4Sm5 · oP36 · Pnma (62)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 1085.71–1346.48 K, x(Pt) 0.44444–0.44444	5	1
CE7PT3_D102 phase:ce-pt:ce7pt3-d102	Fe3Th7 · D10_2 · hP20 · P6_3mc (186)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1134.46 K, x(Pt) 0.3–0.3	4	1
CEPT_B33 phase:ce-pt:cept-b33	CrB · B33 · oC8 · Cmcm (63)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1790 K, x(Pt) 0.5–0.5	7	1
CEPT2_C15 phase:ce-pt:cept2-c15	Cu2Mg · C15 · cF24 · Fd-3m (227)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2024.21 K, x(Pt) 0.6643–0.75166	6	1
CEPT5_D2D phase:ce-pt:cept5-d2d	CaCu5 · D2_d · hP6 · P6/mmm (191)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2044.4 K, x(Pt) 0.83333–0.83333	6	1
FCC_A1 phase:ce-pt:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2499.94 K, x(Pt) 0–1	6	1
HCP_A3 phase:ce-pt:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)	0	1
LIQUID phase:ce-pt:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 922.09–2500 K, x(Pt) 0–1	28	1

BCC_A2 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 987.06–1072 K, x(Pt) 0–0.01128
Literature: 2 values (2 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:bcc-a2
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:(δCe)
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

38: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
39: CONST BCC_A2 : CE% PT : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

CE18PT82 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:ce18pt82; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: no_on_hull_entry_in_both; no_structure_token; sgte_mmc2_row_incomplete
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): (Ce18Pt82) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for CE18PT82: Ce18Pt82
Stoichiometry: Ce 0.1800, Pt 0.8200
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1999.87 K, x(Pt) 0.82–0.82
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:ce18pt82
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:CE18PT82

TDB models of CE18PT82 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: CE18PT82, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

83: PHASE CE18PT82 % 2 0.18 0.82 !
84: CONST CE18PT82 : CE : PT : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase

CE3PT2 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:ce3pt2; status assigned
Structure: Er3Ni2 · hR15 · R-3 (148); type st:er3ni2-hr15; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_both, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Ce 0.6000, Pt 0.4000
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1285.72 K, x(Pt) 0.4–0.4
Literature: 5 values (5 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:ce3pt2
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:Ce3Pt2
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:CE3PT2

TDB models of CE3PT2 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: CE3PT2, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

58: PHASE CE3PT2 % 2 3 2 !
59: CONST CE3PT2 : CE : PT : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

CE3PT4 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:ce3pt4; status assigned
Structure: Pd4Pu3 · hR14 · R-3 (148); type st:pd4pu3-hr14; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_oqmd, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Ce 0.4286, Pt 0.5714
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1632.5 K, x(Pt) 0.57143–0.57143
Literature: 4 values (4 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:ce3pt4
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:Ce3Pt4
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:CE3PT4

TDB models of CE3PT4 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: CE3PT4, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

73: PHASE CE3PT4 % 2 3 4 !
74: CONST CE3PT4 : CE : PT : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

CE5PT3 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:ce5pt3; status assigned
Structure: Pu5Rh3 · tP32 · P4/ncc (130); type st:pu5rh3-tp32; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_structure_token, off_stoichiometric_model); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1209.16 K, x(Pt) 0.37378–0.38497
Literature: 4 values (4 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:ce5pt3
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:Ce5Pt3
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:CE5PT3

TDB models of CE5PT3 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: CE5PT3, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

53: PHASE CE5PT3 % 2 0.615 0.385 !
54: CONST CE5PT3 : CE% PT : CE PT% : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

CE5PT4 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:ce5pt4; status assigned
Structure: Ge4Sm5 · oP36 · Pnma (62); type st:ge4sm5-op36; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_both, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Ce 0.5556, Pt 0.4444
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 1085.71–1346.48 K, x(Pt) 0.44444–0.44444
Literature: 5 values (5 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:ce5pt4
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:Ce5Pt4
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:CE5PT4

TDB models of CE5PT4 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: CE5PT4, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

63: PHASE CE5PT4 % 2 5 4 !
64: CONST CE5PT4 : CE : PT : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

CE7PT3_D102 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:ce7pt3-d102; status assigned
Structure: Fe3Th7 · D10_2 · hP20 · P6_3mc (186); type st:d10-2-fe3th7-hp20; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Ce 0.7000, Pt 0.3000
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1134.46 K, x(Pt) 0.3–0.3
Literature: 4 values (4 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:ce7pt3-d102
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:Ce7Pt3
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:CE7PT3_D102

TDB models of CE7PT3_D102 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: CE7PT3_D102, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

48: PHASE CE7PT3_D102 % 2 7 3 !
49: CONST CE7PT3_D102 : CE : PT : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

CEPT_B33 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:cept-b33; status assigned
Structure: CrB · B33 · oC8 · Cmcm (63); type st:b33-crb-oc8; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Caveat: DFT agrees: on-hull mp-aaaabfld and oqmd-18268, space group 63
Stoichiometry: Ce 0.5000, Pt 0.5000
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1790 K, x(Pt) 0.5–0.5
Literature: 7 values (7 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:cept-b33
mp: mp:mp-aaaabfld
oqmd: oqmd:oqmd-18268
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:CePt
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:CEPT_B33

TDB models of CEPT_B33 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: CEPT_B33, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

68: PHASE CEPT_B33 % 2 1 1 !
69: CONST CEPT_B33 : CE : PT : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

CEPT2_C15 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:cept2-c15; status assigned
Structure: Cu2Mg · C15 · cF24 · Fd-3m (227); type st:c15-cu2mg-cf24; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Caveat: partitioned order/disorder model in CePt-11Liu.tdb also describes the disordered state
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2024.21 K, x(Pt) 0.6643–0.75166
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:cept2-c15
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:CePt2
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:CEPT2_C15

TDB models of CEPT2_C15 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: CEPT2_C15, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

78: PHASE CEPT2_C15 % 2 0.325 0.675 !
79: CONST CEPT2_C15 : CE% PT : CE PT% : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

CEPT5_D2D (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:cept5-d2d; status assigned
Structure: CaCu5 · D2_d · hP6 · P6/mmm (191); type st:d2-d-cacu5-hp6; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Caveat: DFT agrees: on-hull mp-aaabewyb and oqmd-19395, space group 191
Stoichiometry: Ce 0.1667, Pt 0.8333
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2044.4 K, x(Pt) 0.83333–0.83333
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:cept5-d2d
mp: mp:mp-aaabewyb
oqmd: oqmd:oqmd-19395
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:CePt5
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:CEPT5_D2D

TDB models of CEPT5_D2D (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: CEPT5_D2D, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

88: PHASE CEPT5_D2D % 2 1 5 !
89: CONST CEPT5_D2D : CE : PT : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

FCC_A1 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–2499.94 K, x(Pt) 0–1
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:fcc-a1
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:(Pt), paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:(γCe)
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

33: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
34: CONST FCC_A1 : CE% PT% : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

HCP_A3 (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:hcp-a3
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

43: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
44: CONST HCP_A3 : CE PT : VA : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase

LIQUID (Ce–Pt)

Id: phase:ce-pt:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 922.09–2500 K, x(Pt) 0–1
Literature: 28 values (28 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ce-pt:liquid
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006:L
tdb: tdb:CePt-11Liu.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

CePt-11Liu.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 e48916b0e1d3bc2a…

28: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
29: CONST LIQUID:L : CE PT : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.006 X.J. Liu, S.X. Gan, Z.S. Li, Y. Yu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Pt system, Calphad 35, 551-555 (2011).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.012 A. Janghorban, M. Lomello-Tafin, J.M. Moreau, Ph. Galez, The phase diagram of the Ce–Pt system, Intermetallics 18, 2208-2218 (2010).
cited as the source of values for this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}