Gd–Nb phases

4 phases (tier A 3, liquid 1); 3 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Gd–Nb system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the Gd–Nb system (4)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	TDB models
BCC_A2 phase:gd-nb:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–3999.95 K, x(Nb) 0–1	1
FCC_A1 phase:gd-nb:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)	1
HCP_A3 phase:gd-nb:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1602.9 K, x(Nb) 0–2e-05	1
LIQUID phase:gd-nb:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 1566.51–4000 K, x(Nb) 0–1	1

BCC_A2 (Gd–Nb)

Id: phase:gd-nb:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–3999.95 K, x(Nb) 0–1
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:gd-nb:bcc-a2
tdb: tdb:GdNb-23Tam.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GdNb-23Tam.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 78e3824b61f0e0af…

33: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
34: CONST BCC_A2 : GD% NB% : VA : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102596 Rkia Tamim, Olivier Rapaud, Rémy Boulesteix, Alexandre Maître, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ga–Gd, Ga–Nb and Gd–Nb binary phase diagrams towards the Ga–Gd–Nb system, Calphad 82, 102596 (2023).
assessment that models this phase

FCC_A1 (Gd–Nb)

Id: phase:gd-nb:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:gd-nb:fcc-a1
tdb: tdb:GdNb-23Tam.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GdNb-23Tam.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 78e3824b61f0e0af…

28: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
29: CONST FCC_A1 : GD NB : VA : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102596 Rkia Tamim, Olivier Rapaud, Rémy Boulesteix, Alexandre Maître, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ga–Gd, Ga–Nb and Gd–Nb binary phase diagrams towards the Ga–Gd–Nb system, Calphad 82, 102596 (2023).
assessment that models this phase

HCP_A3 (Gd–Nb)

Id: phase:gd-nb:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1602.9 K, x(Nb) 0–2e-05
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:gd-nb:hcp-a3
tdb: tdb:GdNb-23Tam.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GdNb-23Tam.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %, sha256 78e3824b61f0e0af…

38: PHASE HCP_A3 % 2 1 0.5 !
39: CONST HCP_A3 : GD% NB : VA : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102596 Rkia Tamim, Olivier Rapaud, Rémy Boulesteix, Alexandre Maître, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ga–Gd, Ga–Nb and Gd–Nb binary phase diagrams towards the Ga–Gd–Nb system, Calphad 82, 102596 (2023).
assessment that models this phase

LIQUID (Gd–Nb)

Id: phase:gd-nb:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 1566.51–4000 K, x(Nb) 0–1
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:gd-nb:liquid
tdb: tdb:GdNb-23Tam.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GdNb-23Tam.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 78e3824b61f0e0af…

23: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
24: CONST LIQUID:L : GD NB : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102596 Rkia Tamim, Olivier Rapaud, Rémy Boulesteix, Alexandre Maître, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ga–Gd, Ga–Nb and Gd–Nb binary phase diagrams towards the Ga–Gd–Nb system, Calphad 82, 102596 (2023).
assessment that models this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}